Executive Corruption Index in Cuba
Cuba: Executive Corruption Index was 0.63 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Executive Corruption Index in Cuba, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for executive corruption index in Cuba is 0.63, measured in 2025.
That represents a change of up 7.0% on the previous year and up 1.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, executive corruption index in Cuba peaked at 0.875 in 1953 and was at its lowest, 0.525, in 2016.
Cuba ranks 63rd of 176 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 237 years of available data.
Executive Corruption Index in Cuba, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.73 | — |
| 1790 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.73 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.644 | -11.8% |
| 1900 | 0.621 | -3.6% |
| 1901 | 0.621 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.621 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.621 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.621 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.621 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.621 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 0.66 | +6.3% |
| 1908 | 0.66 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.66 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.66 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 0.66 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.66 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.66 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.625 | -5.3% |
| 1915 | 0.625 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.625 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.625 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.625 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 0.625 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.625 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 0.625 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.662 | +5.9% |
| 1923 | 0.662 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.662 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.662 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.662 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.662 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.662 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.701 | +5.9% |
| 1930 | 0.701 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.701 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.701 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.664 | -5.3% |
| 1934 | 0.598 | -9.9% |
| 1935 | 0.598 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.598 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.598 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.598 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.598 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.571 | -4.5% |
| 1941 | 0.571 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.571 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.571 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.571 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.636 | +11.4% |
| 1946 | 0.66 | +3.8% |
| 1947 | 0.66 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.743 | +12.6% |
| 1949 | 0.743 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.743 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.743 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.769 | +3.5% |
| 1953 | 0.875 | +13.8% |
| 1954 | 0.875 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 0.875 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.875 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.875 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.875 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 0.618 | -29.4% |
| 1960 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0.525 | -15.0% |
| 2017 | 0.654 | +24.6% |
| 2018 | 0.589 | -9.9% |
| 2019 | 0.589 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.589 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 0.589 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.589 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.589 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 0.589 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 0.63 | +7.0% |
Cuba compared with similar countries
- Cuba's 0.63 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.545, 1.2× the median. (48 countries reporting)
- Cuba's 0.63 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.501, 1.3× the median. (25 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.7214 | 0.644 | 0.73 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.6327 | 0.621 | 0.66 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.639 | 0.625 | 0.66 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.6585 | 0.625 | 0.701 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.6355 | 0.598 | 0.701 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.6297 | 0.571 | 0.743 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.8123 | 0.618 | 0.875 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.618 | 0.618 | 0.618 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.618 | 0.618 | 0.618 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.618 | 0.618 | 0.618 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.618 | 0.618 | 0.618 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.618 | 0.618 | 0.618 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.6065 | 0.525 | 0.654 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.5958 | 0.589 | 0.63 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
More social development data for Cuba
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 115 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 29,395 (2025)
- Political Rights Rating 7 (2025)
- Electoral democracy 0 (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, gaps filled 7 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0027 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 29,395 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per US$ of GDP (2020)
Frequently asked questions
- What is executive corruption index in Cuba?
- Executive corruption index in Cuba was 0.63 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest executive corruption index recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 0.875 in 1953.
- What is the lowest executive corruption index recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.525 in 2016.
- How does Cuba rank for executive corruption index?
- Cuba ranks 63rd out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is executive corruption index rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Executive Corruption Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of the extent to which high-ranking members of the executive, such as the head of government or cabinet ministers, engage in bribery and theft. The index ranges from 0 to 1 (highly corrupt).