Public Sector Corruption Index in Cuba
Cuba: Public Sector Corruption Index was 0.873 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Public Sector Corruption Index in Cuba, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
Cuba recorded 0.873 for public sector corruption index in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 2.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, public sector corruption index in Cuba peaked at 0.893 in 2015 and was at its lowest, 0.514, in 1902.
Cuba ranks 17th of 176 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 237 years of available data.
Public Sector Corruption Index in Cuba, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.56 | — |
| 1790 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.56 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.642 | +14.6% |
| 1900 | 0.642 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 0.642 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.514 | -19.9% |
| 1903 | 0.514 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.514 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.514 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.514 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 0.607 | +18.1% |
| 1908 | 0.607 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.607 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.607 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 0.607 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.607 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.565 | -6.9% |
| 1914 | 0.565 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.565 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.565 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.565 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.565 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 0.565 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.565 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 0.565 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.565 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.565 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.565 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.565 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.565 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.565 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.565 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.565 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.651 | +15.2% |
| 1931 | 0.651 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.651 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.651 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.681 | +4.6% |
| 1935 | 0.681 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.681 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.681 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.681 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.681 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.572 | -16.0% |
| 1941 | 0.572 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.572 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.572 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.572 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.572 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.594 | +3.8% |
| 1947 | 0.594 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.594 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.594 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.594 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.616 | +3.7% |
| 1952 | 0.636 | +3.2% |
| 1953 | 0.804 | +26.4% |
| 1954 | 0.774 | -3.7% |
| 1955 | 0.774 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.774 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.774 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.774 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 0.635 | -18.0% |
| 1960 | 0.635 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.635 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.635 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.635 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.635 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.635 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.635 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.635 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.635 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.635 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.635 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.635 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.635 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.635 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.635 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.635 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.635 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.635 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.635 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.635 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.635 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.635 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.635 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.635 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.635 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.635 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.635 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.635 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.635 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.635 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.635 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.635 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.866 | +36.4% |
| 1993 | 0.866 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.866 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.866 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.866 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.866 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.866 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.866 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.866 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.866 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.866 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.866 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.866 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.866 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.866 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.866 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.866 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.866 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.866 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.866 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.866 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.866 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 0.866 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0.893 | +3.1% |
| 2016 | 0.873 | -2.2% |
| 2017 | 0.873 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.873 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.873 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.873 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 0.873 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.873 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.873 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 0.873 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 0.873 | +0.0% |
Cuba compared with similar countries
- Cuba's 0.873 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.5295, 1.6× the median. (48 countries reporting)
- Cuba's 0.873 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.467, 1.9× the median. (25 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.5682 | 0.56 | 0.642 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.5675 | 0.514 | 0.642 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.5776 | 0.565 | 0.607 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.565 | 0.565 | 0.565 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.669 | 0.651 | 0.681 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.5808 | 0.572 | 0.594 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.7155 | 0.594 | 0.804 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.635 | 0.635 | 0.635 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.635 | 0.635 | 0.635 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.635 | 0.635 | 0.635 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.8198 | 0.635 | 0.866 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.866 | 0.866 | 0.866 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.8715 | 0.866 | 0.893 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.873 | 0.873 | 0.873 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
- 14 Afghanistan 0.881 compare
- 15 Guinea-Bissau 0.877 compare
- 16 Burundi 0.874 compare
- 18 Central African Republic 0.872 compare
- 18 Mozambique 0.872 compare
- 20 Tajikistan 0.867 compare
More social development data for Cuba
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 115 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 29,395 (2025)
- Political Rights Rating 7 (2025)
- Electoral democracy 0 (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, gaps filled 7 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0027 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 29,395 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per US$ of GDP (2020)
Frequently asked questions
- What is public sector corruption index in Cuba?
- Public sector corruption index in Cuba was 0.873 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest public sector corruption index recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 0.893 in 2015.
- What is the lowest public sector corruption index recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.514 in 1902.
- How does Cuba rank for public sector corruption index?
- Cuba ranks 17th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is public sector corruption index rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is down 2.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Public Sector Corruption Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of the extent to which public sector employees engage in bribery and theft. The index ranges from 0 to 1 (highly corrupt).