Executive Corruption Index in Nepal
Nepal: Executive Corruption Index was 0.27 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Executive Corruption Index in Nepal, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, executive corruption index in Nepal stood at 0.27. That is the lowest value across all 237 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 47.1% on the previous year and down 55.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, executive corruption index in Nepal peaked at 0.903 in 1846 and was at its lowest, 0.27, in 2025.
That places Nepal 118th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 237 years of available data.
Executive Corruption Index in Nepal, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.755 | — |
| 1790 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.755 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.903 | +19.6% |
| 1847 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.841 | -6.9% |
| 1951 | 0.766 | -8.9% |
| 1952 | 0.766 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 0.766 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 0.766 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 0.766 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.766 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.766 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.766 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 0.766 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 0.76 | -0.8% |
| 1961 | 0.836 | +10.0% |
| 1962 | 0.848 | +1.4% |
| 1963 | 0.848 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.848 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.848 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.848 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.848 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.848 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.848 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.848 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.848 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.848 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.848 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.848 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.848 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.848 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.848 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.848 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.848 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.848 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.848 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.848 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.848 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.848 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.848 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.848 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.848 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.848 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.848 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.791 | -6.7% |
| 1991 | 0.695 | -12.1% |
| 1992 | 0.695 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.695 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.695 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.695 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.695 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.695 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.695 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.695 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.695 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.689 | -0.9% |
| 2002 | 0.689 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.689 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.689 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.689 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.65 | -5.7% |
| 2007 | 0.658 | +1.2% |
| 2008 | 0.659 | +0.2% |
| 2009 | 0.638 | -3.2% |
| 2010 | 0.638 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.638 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.655 | +2.7% |
| 2013 | 0.607 | -7.3% |
| 2014 | 0.599 | -1.3% |
| 2015 | 0.602 | +0.5% |
| 2016 | 0.602 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 0.581 | -3.5% |
| 2018 | 0.52 | -10.5% |
| 2019 | 0.587 | +12.9% |
| 2020 | 0.587 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 0.5 | -14.8% |
| 2022 | 0.5 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.5 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 0.51 | +2.0% |
| 2025 | 0.27 | -47.1% |
Nepal compared with similar countries
- Nepal's 0.27 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.6485, 42% of the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Nepal's 0.27 is below the median for South Asia, which is 0.275, 98% of the median. (6 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.755 | 0.755 | 0.755 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.755 | 0.755 | 0.755 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.755 | 0.755 | 0.755 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.755 | 0.755 | 0.755 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.755 | 0.755 | 0.755 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.755 | 0.755 | 0.755 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.8142 | 0.755 | 0.903 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.903 | 0.903 | 0.903 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.903 | 0.903 | 0.903 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.903 | 0.903 | 0.903 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.903 | 0.903 | 0.903 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.903 | 0.903 | 0.903 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.903 | 0.903 | 0.903 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.903 | 0.903 | 0.903 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.903 | 0.903 | 0.903 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.903 | 0.903 | 0.903 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.903 | 0.903 | 0.903 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.7735 | 0.766 | 0.841 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.838 | 0.76 | 0.848 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.848 | 0.848 | 0.848 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.848 | 0.848 | 0.848 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.7046 | 0.695 | 0.791 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.6745 | 0.638 | 0.695 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.6029 | 0.52 | 0.655 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.4778 | 0.27 | 0.587 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Nepal
More social development data for Nepal
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 19,613 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 8,019 (2025)
- Political Rights Rating 3 (2025)
- Electoral democracy 1 (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, gaps filled 3 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0003 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 8,019 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0007 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is executive corruption index in Nepal?
- Executive corruption index in Nepal was 0.27 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest executive corruption index recorded in Nepal?
- The highest recorded value was 0.903 in 1846.
- What is the lowest executive corruption index recorded in Nepal?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.27 in 2025.
- How does Nepal rank for executive corruption index?
- Nepal ranks 118th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is executive corruption index rising or falling in Nepal?
- Over the last ten years it is down 55.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Nepal data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Executive Corruption Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of the extent to which high-ranking members of the executive, such as the head of government or cabinet ministers, engage in bribery and theft. The index ranges from 0 to 1 (highly corrupt).