Executive Corruption Index in Guatemala
Guatemala: Executive Corruption Index was 0.248 in 2025. ▬ Flat
Executive Corruption Index in Guatemala, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, executive corruption index in Guatemala stood at 0.248. That is the lowest value across all 236 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 11.4% on the previous year and down 69.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, executive corruption index in Guatemala peaked at 0.95 in 1899 and was at its lowest, 0.248, in 2025.
Guatemala ranks 121st of 176 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Executive Corruption Index in Guatemala, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.709 | — |
| 1790 | 0.709 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.709 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.709 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.709 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.709 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.709 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.709 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.709 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.709 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.709 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.709 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.709 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.709 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.709 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.709 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.709 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.709 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.709 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.709 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.709 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.709 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.709 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.569 | -19.7% |
| 1813 | 0.569 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.569 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.569 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.569 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.569 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.569 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.569 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.569 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.569 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.712 | +25.1% |
| 1824 | 0.712 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.712 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.712 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.712 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.712 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.712 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.712 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.712 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.712 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.712 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.712 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.712 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.712 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.712 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.712 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.712 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.712 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.712 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.712 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.712 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.824 | +15.7% |
| 1845 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.95 | +15.3% |
| 1900 | 0.95 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 0.95 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.95 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.95 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.95 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.95 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.95 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 0.95 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 0.95 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.95 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.95 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 0.95 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.95 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.95 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.95 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.95 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.95 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.95 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.95 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 0.95 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.94 | -1.1% |
| 1921 | 0.91 | -3.2% |
| 1922 | 0.91 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.91 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.91 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.91 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.917 | +0.8% |
| 1927 | 0.917 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.917 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.917 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.917 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.777 | -15.3% |
| 1932 | 0.777 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.777 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.777 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.777 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.777 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.777 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.777 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.777 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.777 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 0.777 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.777 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.777 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.819 | +5.4% |
| 1945 | 0.287 | -65.0% |
| 1946 | 0.287 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 0.287 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.287 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.287 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.287 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.287 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.287 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 0.287 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 0.389 | +35.5% |
| 1955 | 0.869 | +123.4% |
| 1956 | 0.869 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.893 | +2.8% |
| 1958 | 0.893 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 0.893 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 0.893 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.893 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.893 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.845 | -5.4% |
| 1964 | 0.845 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.845 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.853 | +0.9% |
| 1967 | 0.853 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.853 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.853 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.873 | +2.3% |
| 1971 | 0.873 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.873 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.873 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.873 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.873 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.873 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.873 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.897 | +2.7% |
| 1979 | 0.897 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.897 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.882 | -1.7% |
| 1982 | 0.87 | -1.4% |
| 1983 | 0.759 | -12.8% |
| 1984 | 0.764 | +0.7% |
| 1985 | 0.764 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.774 | +1.3% |
| 1987 | 0.774 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.774 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.774 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.774 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.774 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.774 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.706 | -8.8% |
| 1994 | 0.691 | -2.1% |
| 1995 | 0.691 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.64 | -7.4% |
| 1997 | 0.64 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.64 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.668 | +4.4% |
| 2000 | 0.749 | +12.1% |
| 2001 | 0.749 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.749 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.749 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.753 | +0.5% |
| 2005 | 0.753 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.753 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.753 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.741 | -1.6% |
| 2009 | 0.741 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.741 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.741 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.735 | -0.8% |
| 2013 | 0.821 | +11.7% |
| 2014 | 0.821 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0.809 | -1.5% |
| 2016 | 0.778 | -3.8% |
| 2017 | 0.803 | +3.2% |
| 2018 | 0.864 | +7.6% |
| 2019 | 0.841 | -2.7% |
| 2020 | 0.802 | -4.6% |
| 2021 | 0.795 | -0.9% |
| 2022 | 0.811 | +2.0% |
| 2023 | 0.843 | +3.9% |
| 2024 | 0.28 | -66.8% |
| 2025 | 0.248 | -11.4% |
Guatemala compared with similar countries
- Guatemala's 0.248 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.545, 46% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
- Guatemala's 0.248 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.501, 50% of the median. (25 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.709 | 0.709 | 0.709 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.709 | 0.709 | 0.709 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.709 | 0.709 | 0.709 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.597 | 0.569 | 0.709 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.6802 | 0.569 | 0.712 | 9 |
| 1830s | 0.712 | 0.712 | 0.712 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.7792 | 0.712 | 0.824 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.824 | 0.824 | 0.824 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.824 | 0.824 | 0.824 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.824 | 0.824 | 0.824 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.824 | 0.824 | 0.824 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.8366 | 0.824 | 0.95 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.9158 | 0.91 | 0.94 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.791 | 0.777 | 0.917 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.5362 | 0.287 | 0.819 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.5954 | 0.287 | 0.893 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.8626 | 0.845 | 0.893 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.8778 | 0.873 | 0.897 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.8032 | 0.759 | 0.897 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.6998 | 0.64 | 0.774 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.749 | 0.741 | 0.753 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.7954 | 0.735 | 0.864 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.6298 | 0.248 | 0.843 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Guatemala
More social development data for Guatemala
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 1,586 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 34,994 (2025)
- Political Rights Rating 4 (2025)
- Electoral democracy 1 (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, gaps filled 4 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0019 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 34,994 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0001 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is executive corruption index in Guatemala?
- Executive corruption index in Guatemala was 0.248 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest executive corruption index recorded in Guatemala?
- The highest recorded value was 0.95 in 1899.
- What is the lowest executive corruption index recorded in Guatemala?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.248 in 2025.
- How does Guatemala rank for executive corruption index?
- Guatemala ranks 121st out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is executive corruption index rising or falling in Guatemala?
- Over the last ten years it is down 69.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Guatemala data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Executive Corruption Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 236 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of the extent to which high-ranking members of the executive, such as the head of government or cabinet ministers, engage in bribery and theft. The index ranges from 0 to 1 (highly corrupt).