What is key features of liberal democracy in Latvia?

Key features of liberal democracy in Latvia was 0.751 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.

What is the highest key features of liberal democracy recorded in Latvia?

The highest recorded value was 0.762 in 2023.

What is the lowest key features of liberal democracy recorded in Latvia?

The lowest recorded value was 0.014 in 1789.

How does Latvia rank for key features of liberal democracy?

Latvia ranks 20th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.

Is key features of liberal democracy rising or falling in Latvia?

Over the last ten years it is down 0.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.

Where does this Latvia data come from?

The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Key features of liberal democracy. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Key features of liberal democracy in Latvia

Name: Key features of liberal democracy in Latvia
Creator: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
License: CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)

Latvia: Key features of liberal democracy was 0.751 in 2025. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2025)

0.751

Change on year

down 1.1%

World rank

20th

of 176 countries

All-time high

0.762

in 2023

All-time low

0.014

in 1789

Years of data

237

1789–2025

Key features of liberal democracy in Latvia, 1789–2025

Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.

Analysis

In 2025, key features of liberal democracy in Latvia stood at 0.751.

The figure is down 1.1% on the previous year and down 0.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, key features of liberal democracy in Latvia peaked at 0.762 in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.014, in 1789.

That places Latvia 20th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Key features of liberal democracy in Latvia, year by year

Annual values for Key features of liberal democracy in Latvia, 1789 to 2025.
Year	Value	Change
1789	0.014	—
1790	0.014	+0.0%
1791	0.014	+0.0%
1792	0.014	+0.0%
1793	0.014	+0.0%
1794	0.014	+0.0%
1795	0.014	+0.0%
1796	0.014	+0.0%
1797	0.014	+0.0%
1798	0.014	+0.0%
1799	0.014	+0.0%
1800	0.014	+0.0%
1801	0.015	+7.1%
1802	0.015	+0.0%
1803	0.015	+0.0%
1804	0.015	+0.0%
1805	0.015	+0.0%
1806	0.015	+0.0%
1807	0.015	+0.0%
1808	0.015	+0.0%
1809	0.015	+0.0%
1810	0.015	+0.0%
1811	0.015	+0.0%
1812	0.015	+0.0%
1813	0.015	+0.0%
1814	0.015	+0.0%
1815	0.015	+0.0%
1816	0.015	+0.0%
1817	0.015	+0.0%
1818	0.015	+0.0%
1819	0.015	+0.0%
1820	0.015	+0.0%
1821	0.015	+0.0%
1822	0.014	-6.7%
1823	0.014	+0.0%
1824	0.014	+0.0%
1825	0.014	+0.0%
1826	0.014	+0.0%
1827	0.014	+0.0%
1828	0.014	+0.0%
1829	0.014	+0.0%
1830	0.014	+0.0%
1831	0.014	+0.0%
1832	0.014	+0.0%
1833	0.015	+7.1%
1834	0.015	+0.0%
1835	0.015	+0.0%
1836	0.015	+0.0%
1837	0.015	+0.0%
1838	0.015	+0.0%
1839	0.015	+0.0%
1840	0.015	+0.0%
1841	0.015	+0.0%
1842	0.015	+0.0%
1843	0.015	+0.0%
1844	0.015	+0.0%
1845	0.015	+0.0%
1846	0.015	+0.0%
1847	0.015	+0.0%
1848	0.016	+6.7%
1849	0.016	+0.0%
1850	0.016	+0.0%
1851	0.016	+0.0%
1852	0.016	+0.0%
1853	0.016	+0.0%
1854	0.016	+0.0%
1855	0.027	+68.8%
1856	0.027	+0.0%
1857	0.027	+0.0%
1858	0.027	+0.0%
1859	0.027	+0.0%
1860	0.027	+0.0%
1861	0.031	+14.8%
1862	0.031	+0.0%
1863	0.032	+3.2%
1864	0.068	+112.5%
1865	0.081	+19.1%
1866	0.091	+12.3%
1867	0.092	+1.1%
1868	0.092	+0.0%
1869	0.092	+0.0%
1870	0.093	+1.1%
1871	0.093	+0.0%
1872	0.093	+0.0%
1873	0.093	+0.0%
1874	0.096	+3.2%
1875	0.096	+0.0%
1876	0.096	+0.0%
1877	0.096	+0.0%
1878	0.055	-42.7%
1879	0.055	+0.0%
1880	0.055	+0.0%
1881	0.039	-29.1%
1882	0.039	+0.0%
1883	0.039	+0.0%
1884	0.039	+0.0%
1885	0.04	+2.6%
1886	0.04	+0.0%
1887	0.04	+0.0%
1888	0.04	+0.0%
1889	0.04	+0.0%
1890	0.04	+0.0%
1891	0.04	+0.0%
1892	0.04	+0.0%
1893	0.04	+0.0%
1894	0.046	+15.0%
1895	0.046	+0.0%
1896	0.046	+0.0%
1897	0.045	-2.2%
1898	0.045	+0.0%
1899	0.045	+0.0%
1900	0.038	-15.6%
1901	0.039	+2.6%
1902	0.039	+0.0%
1903	0.039	+0.0%
1904	0.039	+0.0%
1905	0.038	-2.6%
1906	0.06	+57.9%
1907	0.063	+5.0%
1908	0.071	+12.7%
1909	0.073	+2.8%
1910	0.072	-1.4%
1911	0.074	+2.8%
1912	0.074	+0.0%
1913	0.074	+0.0%
1914	0.072	-2.7%
1915	0.07	-2.8%
1916	0.069	-1.4%
1917	0.063	-8.7%
1918	0.028	-55.6%
1919	0.022	-21.4%
1920	0.253	+1050.0%
1921	0.254	+0.4%
1922	0.305	+20.1%
1923	0.608	+99.3%
1924	0.613	+0.8%
1925	0.612	-0.2%
1926	0.611	-0.2%
1927	0.611	+0.0%
1928	0.61	-0.2%
1929	0.604	-1.0%
1930	0.604	+0.0%
1931	0.604	+0.0%
1932	0.605	+0.2%
1933	0.605	+0.0%
1934	0.247	-59.2%
1935	0.142	-42.5%
1936	0.141	-0.7%
1937	0.141	+0.0%
1938	0.141	+0.0%
1939	0.141	+0.0%
1940	0.014	-90.1%
1941	0.014	+0.0%
1942	0.014	+0.0%
1943	0.014	+0.0%
1944	0.014	+0.0%
1945	0.014	+0.0%
1946	0.015	+7.1%
1947	0.015	+0.0%
1948	0.015	+0.0%
1949	0.015	+0.0%
1950	0.015	+0.0%
1951	0.015	+0.0%
1952	0.015	+0.0%
1953	0.015	+0.0%
1954	0.021	+40.0%
1955	0.021	+0.0%
1956	0.022	+4.8%
1957	0.024	+9.1%
1958	0.024	+0.0%
1959	0.024	+0.0%
1960	0.024	+0.0%
1961	0.024	+0.0%
1962	0.023	-4.2%
1963	0.023	+0.0%
1964	0.023	+0.0%
1965	0.023	+0.0%
1966	0.023	+0.0%
1967	0.023	+0.0%
1968	0.023	+0.0%
1969	0.023	+0.0%
1970	0.024	+4.3%
1971	0.025	+4.2%
1972	0.025	+0.0%
1973	0.025	+0.0%
1974	0.025	+0.0%
1975	0.025	+0.0%
1976	0.025	+0.0%
1977	0.024	-4.0%
1978	0.024	+0.0%
1979	0.025	+4.2%
1980	0.028	+12.0%
1981	0.028	+0.0%
1982	0.028	+0.0%
1983	0.027	-3.6%
1984	0.027	+0.0%
1985	0.029	+7.4%
1986	0.037	+27.6%
1987	0.041	+10.8%
1988	0.043	+4.9%
1989	0.064	+48.8%
1990	0.452	+606.2%
1991	0.495	+9.5%
1992	0.561	+13.3%
1993	0.629	+12.1%
1994	0.68	+8.1%
1995	0.67	-1.5%
1996	0.674	+0.6%
1997	0.694	+3.0%
1998	0.696	+0.3%
1999	0.701	+0.7%
2000	0.702	+0.1%
2001	0.702	+0.0%
2002	0.705	+0.4%
2003	0.714	+1.3%
2004	0.715	+0.1%
2005	0.71	-0.7%
2006	0.703	-1.0%
2007	0.685	-2.6%
2008	0.686	+0.1%
2009	0.694	+1.2%
2010	0.704	+1.4%
2011	0.723	+2.7%
2012	0.728	+0.7%
2013	0.743	+2.1%
2014	0.748	+0.7%
2015	0.754	+0.8%
2016	0.748	-0.8%
2017	0.744	-0.5%
2018	0.745	+0.1%
2019	0.741	-0.5%
2020	0.737	-0.5%
2021	0.74	+0.4%
2022	0.74	+0.0%
2023	0.762	+3.0%
2024	0.759	-0.4%
2025	0.751	-1.1%

Latvia compared with similar countries

Latvia's 0.751 is above the median for high income countries, which is 0.689, 1.1× the median. (55 countries reporting)
Latvia's 0.751 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.591, 1.3× the median. (48 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

Decade	Average	Lowest	Highest	Years
1780s	0.014	0.014	0.014	1
1790s	0.014	0.014	0.014	10
1800s	0.0149	0.014	0.015	10
1810s	0.015	0.015	0.015	10
1820s	0.0142	0.014	0.015	10
1830s	0.0147	0.014	0.015	10
1840s	0.0152	0.015	0.016	10
1850s	0.0215	0.016	0.027	10
1860s	0.0637	0.027	0.092	10
1870s	0.0866	0.055	0.096	10
1880s	0.0411	0.039	0.055	10
1890s	0.0433	0.04	0.046	10
1900s	0.0499	0.038	0.073	10
1910s	0.0618	0.022	0.074	10
1920s	0.5081	0.253	0.613	10
1930s	0.3371	0.141	0.605	10
1940s	0.0144	0.014	0.015	10
1950s	0.0196	0.015	0.024	10
1960s	0.0232	0.023	0.024	10
1970s	0.0247	0.024	0.025	10
1980s	0.0352	0.027	0.064	10
1990s	0.6252	0.452	0.701	10
2000s	0.7016	0.685	0.715	10
2010s	0.7378	0.704	0.754	10
2020s	0.7482	0.737	0.762	6

Countries ranked near Latvia

17 Luxembourg 0.777 compare
18 Netherlands 0.774 compare
19 Austria 0.757 compare
21 Spain 0.741 compare
22 South Korea 0.739 compare
23 Canada 0.736 compare

See the full ranking of 176 places →

More social development data for Latvia

Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 32,454 (2025)
Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 189 (2025)
Political Rights Rating 1 (2025)
Electoral democracy 1 (2025)
Political rights rating fh, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
Political rights rating fh, gaps filled 1 (2025)
Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0001 units per person (2025)
Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 189 (2025)
Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0176 units per person (2025)
Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)

All data for Latvia →

Frequently asked questions

What is key features of liberal democracy in Latvia?: Key features of liberal democracy in Latvia was 0.751 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest key features of liberal democracy recorded in Latvia?: The highest recorded value was 0.762 in 2023.
What is the lowest key features of liberal democracy recorded in Latvia?: The lowest recorded value was 0.014 in 1789.
How does Latvia rank for key features of liberal democracy?: Latvia ranks 20th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
Is key features of liberal democracy rising or falling in Latvia?: Over the last ten years it is down 0.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Latvia data come from?: The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Key features of liberal democracy. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Key features of liberal democracy in Latvia. Statizoid, drawing on V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 08 October 2026, from https://social-development.statizoid.com/stat/key-features-of-liberal-democracy/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://social-development.statizoid.com/stat/key-features-of-liberal-democracy/latvia/">Key features of liberal democracy in Latvia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Key features of liberal democracy
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage: 176 places, 28,671 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed: 18 September 2026

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, individual and minority rights, equality before the law, and executive constraints.