Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Suriname
Suriname: Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate was -1.26 % change on previous year in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
-1.26 % change on previous year
Change on year
down 898.7%
World rank
106th
of 176 countries
All-time high
109.73 % change on previous year
in 1988
All-time low
-72.12 % change on previous year
in 1980
Years of data
125
1901–2025
Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Suriname, 1901–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2025, key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Suriname stood at -1.26 % change on previous year.
The figure is down 898.7% on the previous year and down 231.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Suriname peaked at 109.73 % change on previous year in 1988 and was at its lowest, -72.12 % change on previous year, in 1980.
Suriname ranks 106th of 176 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Suriname, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1901 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1902 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1903 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1904 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1905 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1906 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1907 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1908 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1909 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1910 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1911 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1912 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1913 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1914 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1915 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1916 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1917 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1918 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1919 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1920 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1921 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1922 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1923 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1924 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1925 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1926 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1927 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1928 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1929 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1930 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1931 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1932 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1933 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1934 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1935 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1936 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1937 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1938 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1939 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1940 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1941 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1942 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1943 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1944 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1945 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1946 | 3.9 % change on previous year | — |
| 1947 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1948 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1949 | 63.12 % change on previous year | — |
| 1950 | 55.56 % change on previous year | -12.0% |
| 1951 | 0.2463 % change on previous year | -99.6% |
| 1952 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1953 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1954 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1955 | 3.93 % change on previous year | — |
| 1956 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1957 | 0.4728 % change on previous year | — |
| 1958 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1959 | 0.2353 % change on previous year | — |
| 1960 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1961 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1962 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1963 | 0.4695 % change on previous year | — |
| 1964 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1965 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1966 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1967 | -0.2336 % change on previous year | — |
| 1968 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1969 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1970 | 0.7026 % change on previous year | — |
| 1971 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1972 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1973 | -0.9302 % change on previous year | — |
| 1974 | 1.41 % change on previous year | -251.4% |
| 1975 | -21.99 % change on previous year | -1661.3% |
| 1976 | 83.09 % change on previous year | -477.8% |
| 1977 | -0.6483 % change on previous year | -100.8% |
| 1978 | 1.79 % change on previous year | -376.8% |
| 1979 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1980 | -72.12 % change on previous year | — |
| 1981 | -18.39 % change on previous year | -74.5% |
| 1982 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1983 | -0.7042 % change on previous year | — |
| 1984 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1985 | 31.21 % change on previous year | — |
| 1986 | 0.5405 % change on previous year | -98.3% |
| 1987 | 21.51 % change on previous year | +3878.5% |
| 1988 | 109.73 % change on previous year | +410.3% |
| 1989 | 21.52 % change on previous year | -80.4% |
| 1990 | -5.03 % change on previous year | -123.4% |
| 1991 | -31.63 % change on previous year | +528.2% |
| 1992 | 67.38 % change on previous year | -313.0% |
| 1993 | 1.44 % change on previous year | -97.9% |
| 1994 | 0.6299 % change on previous year | -56.2% |
| 1995 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1996 | 1.72 % change on previous year | — |
| 1997 | 0.3077 % change on previous year | -82.1% |
| 1998 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1999 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2000 | 1.99 % change on previous year | — |
| 2001 | -0.4511 % change on previous year | -122.6% |
| 2002 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2003 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2004 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2005 | -1.21 % change on previous year | — |
| 2006 | -0.7645 % change on previous year | -36.7% |
| 2007 | -0.6163 % change on previous year | -19.4% |
| 2008 | 0.3101 % change on previous year | -150.3% |
| 2009 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2010 | -2.32 % change on previous year | — |
| 2011 | -0.7911 % change on previous year | -65.9% |
| 2012 | -0.4785 % change on previous year | -39.5% |
| 2013 | 0.4808 % change on previous year | -200.5% |
| 2014 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2015 | 0.9569 % change on previous year | — |
| 2016 | -1.74 % change on previous year | -281.6% |
| 2017 | 0.6431 % change on previous year | -137.0% |
| 2018 | -2.72 % change on previous year | -522.3% |
| 2019 | -4.27 % change on previous year | +57.2% |
| 2020 | 7.72 % change on previous year | -280.8% |
| 2021 | 1.75 % change on previous year | -77.3% |
| 2022 | 2.5 % change on previous year | +43.0% |
| 2023 | -3.36 % change on previous year | -234.1% |
| 2024 | 0.158 % change on previous year | -104.7% |
| 2025 | -1.26 % change on previous year | -898.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1910s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1920s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1930s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1940s | 6.7 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 63.12 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1950s | 6.04 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 55.56 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.0236 % change on previous year | -0.2336 % change on previous year | 0.4695 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1970s | 6.34 % change on previous year | -21.99 % change on previous year | 83.09 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 9.33 % change on previous year | -72.12 % change on previous year | 109.73 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.48 % change on previous year | -31.63 % change on previous year | 67.38 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | -0.0736 % change on previous year | -1.21 % change on previous year | 1.99 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | -1.02 % change on previous year | -4.27 % change on previous year | 0.9569 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.25 % change on previous year | -3.36 % change on previous year | 7.72 % change on previous year | 6 |
Countries ranked near Suriname
- 103 Rwanda -1.1 % change on previous year compare
- 104 Malaysia -1.11 % change on previous year compare
- 105 Brazil -1.12 % change on previous year compare
- 107 Estonia -1.3 % change on previous year compare
- 108 Kazakhstan -1.5 % change on previous year compare
- 109 Israel -1.51 % change on previous year compare
More social development data for Suriname
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 24 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 56 (2025)
- Political rights rating fh 2 (2025)
- Democracy lexical 1 (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, gaps filled 2 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0001 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 56 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Suriname?
- Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Suriname was -1.26 % change on previous year in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate recorded in Suriname?
- The highest recorded value was 109.73 % change on previous year in 1988.
- What is the lowest key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate recorded in Suriname?
- The lowest recorded value was -72.12 % change on previous year in 1980.
- How does Suriname rank for key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate?
- Suriname ranks 106th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate rising or falling in Suriname?
- Over the last ten years it is down 231.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Suriname data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 125 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Key features of liberal democracy. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Key features of liberal democracy Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Key features of liberal democracy. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.