Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate was -1.5 % change on previous year in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
-1.5 % change on previous year
Change on year
up 65.2%
World rank
108th
of 176 countries
All-time high
134.38 % change on previous year
in 1990
All-time low
-55.56 % change on previous year
in 1918
Years of data
236
1790–2025
Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Kazakhstan, 1790–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2025, key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Kazakhstan stood at -1.5 % change on previous year.
That represents a change of up 65.2% on the previous year and down 142.5% over five years.
Over the whole period, key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Kazakhstan peaked at 134.38 % change on previous year in 1990 and was at its lowest, -55.56 % change on previous year, in 1918.
Kazakhstan ranks 108th of 176 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1790 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1791 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1792 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1793 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1794 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1795 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1796 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1797 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1798 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1799 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1800 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1801 | 7.14 % change on previous year | — |
| 1802 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1803 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1804 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1805 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1806 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1807 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1808 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1809 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1810 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1811 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1812 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1813 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1814 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1815 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1816 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1817 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1818 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1819 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1820 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1821 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1822 | -6.67 % change on previous year | — |
| 1823 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1824 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1825 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1826 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1827 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1828 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1829 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1830 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1831 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1832 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1833 | 7.14 % change on previous year | — |
| 1834 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1835 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1836 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1837 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1838 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1839 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1840 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1841 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1842 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1843 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1844 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1845 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1846 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1847 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1848 | 6.67 % change on previous year | — |
| 1849 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1850 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1851 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1852 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1853 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1854 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1855 | 68.75 % change on previous year | — |
| 1856 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1857 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1858 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1859 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1860 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1861 | 14.81 % change on previous year | — |
| 1862 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1863 | 3.23 % change on previous year | — |
| 1864 | 112.5 % change on previous year | +3387.5% |
| 1865 | 19.12 % change on previous year | -83.0% |
| 1866 | 12.35 % change on previous year | -35.4% |
| 1867 | 1.1 % change on previous year | -91.1% |
| 1868 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1869 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1870 | 1.09 % change on previous year | — |
| 1871 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1872 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1873 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1874 | 3.23 % change on previous year | — |
| 1875 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1876 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1877 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1878 | -42.71 % change on previous year | — |
| 1879 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1880 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1881 | -29.09 % change on previous year | — |
| 1882 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1883 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1884 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1885 | 2.56 % change on previous year | — |
| 1886 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1887 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1888 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1889 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1890 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1891 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1892 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1893 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1894 | 15 % change on previous year | — |
| 1895 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1896 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1897 | -2.17 % change on previous year | — |
| 1898 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1899 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1900 | -15.56 % change on previous year | — |
| 1901 | 2.63 % change on previous year | -116.9% |
| 1902 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1903 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1904 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1905 | -2.56 % change on previous year | — |
| 1906 | 57.89 % change on previous year | -2357.9% |
| 1907 | 5 % change on previous year | -91.4% |
| 1908 | 12.7 % change on previous year | +154.0% |
| 1909 | 2.82 % change on previous year | -77.8% |
| 1910 | -1.37 % change on previous year | -148.6% |
| 1911 | 2.78 % change on previous year | -302.8% |
| 1912 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1913 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1914 | -2.7 % change on previous year | — |
| 1915 | -2.78 % change on previous year | +2.8% |
| 1916 | -1.43 % change on previous year | -48.6% |
| 1917 | -8.7 % change on previous year | +508.7% |
| 1918 | -55.56 % change on previous year | +538.9% |
| 1919 | -21.43 % change on previous year | -61.4% |
| 1920 | -4.55 % change on previous year | -78.8% |
| 1921 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1922 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1923 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1924 | -14.29 % change on previous year | — |
| 1925 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1926 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1927 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1928 | -5.56 % change on previous year | — |
| 1929 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1930 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1931 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1932 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1933 | -5.88 % change on previous year | — |
| 1934 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1935 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1936 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1937 | 6.25 % change on previous year | — |
| 1938 | -17.65 % change on previous year | -382.4% |
| 1939 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1940 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1941 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1942 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1943 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1944 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1945 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1946 | 7.14 % change on previous year | — |
| 1947 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1948 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1949 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1950 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1951 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1952 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1953 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1954 | 40 % change on previous year | — |
| 1955 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1956 | 4.76 % change on previous year | — |
| 1957 | 9.09 % change on previous year | +90.9% |
| 1958 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1959 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1960 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1961 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1962 | -4.17 % change on previous year | — |
| 1963 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1964 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1965 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1966 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1967 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1968 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1969 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1970 | 4.35 % change on previous year | — |
| 1971 | 4.17 % change on previous year | -4.2% |
| 1972 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1973 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1974 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1975 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1976 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1977 | -4 % change on previous year | — |
| 1978 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1979 | 4.17 % change on previous year | — |
| 1980 | 12 % change on previous year | +188.0% |
| 1981 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1982 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1983 | -3.57 % change on previous year | — |
| 1984 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1985 | 7.41 % change on previous year | — |
| 1986 | 27.59 % change on previous year | +272.4% |
| 1987 | 10.81 % change on previous year | -60.8% |
| 1988 | 4.88 % change on previous year | -54.9% |
| 1989 | 48.84 % change on previous year | +901.2% |
| 1990 | 134.38 % change on previous year | +175.1% |
| 1991 | 14 % change on previous year | -89.6% |
| 1992 | 4.68 % change on previous year | -66.6% |
| 1993 | 1.12 % change on previous year | -76.1% |
| 1994 | -2.76 % change on previous year | -347.2% |
| 1995 | -16.48 % change on previous year | +496.5% |
| 1996 | -10.2 % change on previous year | -38.1% |
| 1997 | 3.03 % change on previous year | -129.7% |
| 1998 | -1.47 % change on previous year | -148.5% |
| 1999 | -4.48 % change on previous year | +204.5% |
| 2000 | 0.7812 % change on previous year | -117.4% |
| 2001 | -3.1 % change on previous year | -496.9% |
| 2002 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2003 | -3.2 % change on previous year | — |
| 2004 | 0.8264 % change on previous year | -125.8% |
| 2005 | -1.64 % change on previous year | -298.4% |
| 2006 | 0.8333 % change on previous year | -150.8% |
| 2007 | 0.8264 % change on previous year | -0.8% |
| 2008 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2009 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2010 | -1.64 % change on previous year | — |
| 2011 | -0.8333 % change on previous year | -49.2% |
| 2012 | -5.04 % change on previous year | +505.0% |
| 2013 | -3.54 % change on previous year | -29.8% |
| 2014 | 0.9174 % change on previous year | -125.9% |
| 2015 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2016 | 3.64 % change on previous year | — |
| 2017 | -1.75 % change on previous year | -148.2% |
| 2018 | -3.57 % change on previous year | +103.6% |
| 2019 | 4.63 % change on previous year | -229.6% |
| 2020 | 3.54 % change on previous year | -23.5% |
| 2021 | 3.42 % change on previous year | -3.4% |
| 2022 | 10.74 % change on previous year | +214.3% |
| 2023 | 3.73 % change on previous year | -65.3% |
| 2024 | -4.32 % change on previous year | -215.7% |
| 2025 | -1.5 % change on previous year | -65.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1790s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.7143 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 7.14 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1810s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1820s | -0.6667 % change on previous year | -6.67 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.7143 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 7.14 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.6667 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 6.67 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1850s | 6.88 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 68.75 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1860s | 16.31 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 112.5 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1870s | -3.84 % change on previous year | -42.71 % change on previous year | 3.23 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1880s | -2.65 % change on previous year | -29.09 % change on previous year | 2.56 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1890s | 1.28 % change on previous year | -2.17 % change on previous year | 15 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1900s | 6.29 % change on previous year | -15.56 % change on previous year | 57.89 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1910s | -9.12 % change on previous year | -55.56 % change on previous year | 2.78 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1920s | -2.44 % change on previous year | -14.29 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1930s | -1.73 % change on previous year | -17.65 % change on previous year | 6.25 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.7143 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 7.14 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1950s | 5.39 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 40 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1960s | -0.4167 % change on previous year | -4.17 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.8681 % change on previous year | -4 % change on previous year | 4.35 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 10.79 % change on previous year | -3.57 % change on previous year | 48.84 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 12.18 % change on previous year | -16.48 % change on previous year | 134.38 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | -0.4673 % change on previous year | -3.2 % change on previous year | 0.8333 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | -0.7197 % change on previous year | -5.04 % change on previous year | 4.63 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.6 % change on previous year | -4.32 % change on previous year | 10.74 % change on previous year | 6 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
- 105 Brazil -1.12 % change on previous year compare
- 106 Suriname -1.26 % change on previous year compare
- 107 Estonia -1.3 % change on previous year compare
- 109 Israel -1.51 % change on previous year compare
- 110 Cape Verde -1.71 % change on previous year compare
- 111 Russia -1.75 % change on previous year compare
More social development data for Kazakhstan
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 4,377 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 4,144 (2025)
- Political rights rating fh 7 (2025)
- Democracy lexical 0 (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, gaps filled 7 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0002 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 4,144 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0002 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Kazakhstan?
- Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Kazakhstan was -1.5 % change on previous year in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 134.38 % change on previous year in 1990.
- What is the lowest key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was -55.56 % change on previous year in 1918.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate?
- Kazakhstan ranks 108th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 236 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Key features of liberal democracy. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Key features of liberal democracy Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Key features of liberal democracy. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.