Electoral democracy in Philippines
Philippines: Electoral democracy was 1 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Electoral democracy in Philippines, 1900–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, electoral democracy in Philippines stood at 1.
That represents a change of down 50.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, electoral democracy in Philippines peaked at 2 in 1988 and was at its lowest, 0, in 1900.
That places Philippines 87th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.5 | 0 | 1 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.6 | 0 | 1 | 10 |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.4444 | 0 | 1 | 9 |
| 1980s | 0.8 | 0 | 2 | 10 |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.4 | 1 | 2 | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.6 | 1 | 2 | 10 |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Philippines
- 87 Albania 1 compare
- 87 Algeria 1 compare
- 87 Angola 1 compare
- 87 Azerbaijan 1 compare
- 87 Benin 1 compare
- 87 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 compare
- 87 Burundi 1 compare
- 87 Cambodia 1 compare
- 87 Cameroon 1 compare
- 87 Central African Republic 1 compare
- 87 Chad 1 compare
- 87 Comoros 1 compare
- 87 Congo 1 compare
- 87 Cote d'Ivoire 1 compare
- 87 Democratic Republic of Congo 1 compare
- 87 Djibouti 1 compare
- 87 Egypt 1 compare
- 87 El Salvador 1 compare
- 87 Equatorial Guinea 1 compare
- 87 Ethiopia 1 compare
- 87 Gabon 1 compare
- 87 Georgia 1 compare
- 87 Hungary 1 compare
- 87 India 1 compare
- 87 Indonesia 1 compare
- 87 Iran 1 compare
- 87 Iraq 1 compare
- 87 Kazakhstan 1 compare
- 87 Kyrgyzstan 1 compare
- 87 Lebanon 1 compare
- 87 Mauritania 1 compare
- 87 Mexico 1 compare
- 87 Mozambique 1 compare
- 87 Nicaragua 1 compare
- 87 Pakistan 1 compare
- 87 Papua New Guinea 1 compare
- 87 Russia 1 compare
- 87 Rwanda 1 compare
- 87 Serbia 1 compare
- 87 Sierra Leone 1 compare
- 87 Singapore 1 compare
- 87 Tajikistan 1 compare
- 87 Tanzania 1 compare
- 87 Thailand 1 compare
- 87 Togo 1 compare
- 87 Tunisia 1 compare
- 87 Turkey 1 compare
- 87 Turkmenistan 1 compare
- 87 Uganda 1 compare
- 87 Ukraine 1 compare
- 87 Uzbekistan 1 compare
- 87 Venezuela 1 compare
- 87 Zambia 1 compare
- 87 Zimbabwe 1 compare
More social development data for Philippines
- Political Rights Rating 3 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of asy 1,032 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of ori 807 (2025)
- Electoral democracy 1 (2025)
- Key features of democracy 0.392 (2025)
- Freedom of Expression Index 0.676 (2025)
- Freedom of Association Index 0.698 (2025)
- Electoral Democracy Index 0.392 (2025)
- Participatory Democracy Index 0.261 (2025)
- Liberal Democracy Index 0.291 (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is electoral democracy in Philippines?
- Electoral democracy in Philippines was 1 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest electoral democracy recorded in Philippines?
- The highest recorded value was 2 in 1988.
- What is the lowest electoral democracy recorded in Philippines?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 1900.
- How does Philippines rank for electoral democracy?
- Philippines ranks 87th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is electoral democracy rising or falling in Philippines?
- Over the last ten years it is down 50.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Philippines data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Electoral democracy. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 125 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Identifies the political regime of a country using the Regimes of the World classification by political scientists Anna Lührmann, Marcus Tannenberg and Staffan Lindberg.