Electoral democracy in Papua New Guinea
Papua New Guinea: Electoral democracy was 1 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Electoral democracy in Papua New Guinea, 1900–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, electoral democracy in Papua New Guinea stood at 1.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, electoral democracy in Papua New Guinea peaked at 2 in 1973 and was at its lowest, 0, in 1900.
That places Papua New Guinea 87th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1970s | 1.5 | 0 | 2 | 10 |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.8 | 1 | 2 | 10 |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Papua New Guinea
- 87 Albania 1 compare
- 87 Algeria 1 compare
- 87 Angola 1 compare
- 87 Azerbaijan 1 compare
- 87 Benin 1 compare
- 87 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 compare
- 87 Burundi 1 compare
- 87 Cambodia 1 compare
- 87 Cameroon 1 compare
- 87 Central African Republic 1 compare
- 87 Chad 1 compare
- 87 Comoros 1 compare
- 87 Congo 1 compare
- 87 Cote d'Ivoire 1 compare
- 87 Democratic Republic of Congo 1 compare
- 87 Djibouti 1 compare
- 87 Egypt 1 compare
- 87 El Salvador 1 compare
- 87 Equatorial Guinea 1 compare
- 87 Ethiopia 1 compare
- 87 Gabon 1 compare
- 87 Georgia 1 compare
- 87 Hungary 1 compare
- 87 India 1 compare
- 87 Indonesia 1 compare
- 87 Iran 1 compare
- 87 Iraq 1 compare
- 87 Kazakhstan 1 compare
- 87 Kyrgyzstan 1 compare
- 87 Lebanon 1 compare
- 87 Mauritania 1 compare
- 87 Mexico 1 compare
- 87 Mozambique 1 compare
- 87 Nicaragua 1 compare
- 87 Pakistan 1 compare
- 87 Philippines 1 compare
- 87 Russia 1 compare
- 87 Rwanda 1 compare
- 87 Serbia 1 compare
- 87 Sierra Leone 1 compare
- 87 Singapore 1 compare
- 87 Tajikistan 1 compare
- 87 Tanzania 1 compare
- 87 Thailand 1 compare
- 87 Togo 1 compare
- 87 Tunisia 1 compare
- 87 Turkey 1 compare
- 87 Turkmenistan 1 compare
- 87 Uganda 1 compare
- 87 Ukraine 1 compare
- 87 Uzbekistan 1 compare
- 87 Venezuela 1 compare
- 87 Zambia 1 compare
- 87 Zimbabwe 1 compare
More social development data for Papua New Guinea
- Political Rights Rating 4 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of asy 7,727 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of ori 644 (2025)
- Electoral democracy 1 (2025)
- Key features of democracy 0.467 (2025)
- Freedom of Expression Index 0.839 (2025)
- Freedom of Association Index 0.879 (2025)
- Electoral Democracy Index 0.467 (2025)
- Participatory Democracy Index 0.28 (2025)
- Liberal Democracy Index 0.384 (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is electoral democracy in Papua New Guinea?
- Electoral democracy in Papua New Guinea was 1 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest electoral democracy recorded in Papua New Guinea?
- The highest recorded value was 2 in 1973.
- What is the lowest electoral democracy recorded in Papua New Guinea?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 1900.
- How does Papua New Guinea rank for electoral democracy?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 87th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is electoral democracy rising or falling in Papua New Guinea?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Papua New Guinea data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Electoral democracy. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 126 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Identifies the political regime of a country using the Regimes of the World classification by political scientists Anna Lührmann, Marcus Tannenberg and Staffan Lindberg.