Democracy Index in Brazil
Brazil: Democracy Index was 8 in 2018. ◆ Volatile
Democracy Index in Brazil, 1824–2018
Source: Polity 5 (2020); Population based on various sources (2023) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2018, democracy index in Brazil stood at 8. That is the highest value across all 195 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, democracy index in Brazil peaked at 8 in 1988 and was at its lowest, -9, in 1965.
That places Brazil 52nd out of 168 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Democracy Index in Brazil, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1824 | -6 | — |
| 1825 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1867 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1869 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1870 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1871 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1872 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -3 | -50.0% |
| 1890 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1906 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1907 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1908 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1909 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1916 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1918 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1919 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1920 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1921 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1922 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1923 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1924 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1925 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1926 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1927 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1928 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1929 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1930 | -4 | +33.3% |
| 1931 | -5 | +25.0% |
| 1932 | -6 | +20.0% |
| 1933 | -6 | -0.0% |
| 1934 | -7 | +16.7% |
| 1935 | -7 | -0.0% |
| 1936 | -7 | -0.0% |
| 1937 | -7 | -0.0% |
| 1938 | -7 | -0.0% |
| 1939 | -7 | -0.0% |
| 1940 | -7 | -0.0% |
| 1941 | -7 | -0.0% |
| 1942 | -7 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -7 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -7 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 1946 | 7 | — |
| 1947 | 5 | -28.6% |
| 1948 | 5 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 5 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 5 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 5 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 5 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 5 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 5 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 5 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 5 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 5 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 6 | +20.0% |
| 1959 | 6 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 6 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 5 | -16.7% |
| 1962 | 5 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 3 | -40.0% |
| 1964 | -3 | -200.0% |
| 1965 | -9 | +200.0% |
| 1966 | -9 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -9 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -9 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -9 | -0.0% |
| 1970 | -9 | -0.0% |
| 1971 | -9 | -0.0% |
| 1972 | -9 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -9 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -4 | -55.6% |
| 1975 | -4 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -4 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -4 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -4 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -4 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -4 | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -4 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -3 | -25.0% |
| 1983 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1984 | -3 | -0.0% |
| 1985 | 7 | -333.3% |
| 1986 | 7 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 7 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 8 | +14.3% |
| 1989 | 8 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 8 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 8 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 8 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 8 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 8 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 8 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 8 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 8 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 8 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 8 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 8 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 8 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 8 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 8 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 8 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 8 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 8 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 8 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 8 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 8 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 8 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 8 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 8 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 8 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 8 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 8 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 8 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 8 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 8 | +0.0% |
Brazil compared with similar countries
- Brazil's 8 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 7, 1.1× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Brazil's 8 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 8, 1.0× the median. (24 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1820s | -6 | -6 | -6 | 6 |
| 1830s | -6 | -6 | -6 | 10 |
| 1840s | -6 | -6 | -6 | 10 |
| 1850s | -6 | -6 | -6 | 10 |
| 1860s | -6 | -6 | -6 | 10 |
| 1870s | -6 | -6 | -6 | 10 |
| 1880s | -5.7 | -6 | -3 | 10 |
| 1890s | -3 | -3 | -3 | 10 |
| 1900s | -3 | -3 | -3 | 10 |
| 1910s | -3 | -3 | -3 | 10 |
| 1920s | -3 | -3 | -3 | 10 |
| 1930s | -6.3 | -7 | -4 | 10 |
| 1940s | -1.3 | -7 | 7 | 10 |
| 1950s | 5.2 | 5 | 6 | 10 |
| 1960s | -2.9 | -9 | 6 | 10 |
| 1970s | -6 | -9 | -4 | 10 |
| 1980s | 2 | -4 | 8 | 10 |
| 1990s | 8 | 8 | 8 | 10 |
| 2000s | 8 | 8 | 8 | 10 |
| 2010s | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
- 52 Belgium 8 compare
- 52 Botswana 8 compare
- 52 East Timor 8 compare
- 52 El Salvador 8 compare
- 52 Ghana 8 compare
- 52 Guatemala 8 compare
- 52 Kyrgyzstan 8 compare
- 52 Latvia 8 compare
- 52 Lesotho 8 compare
- 52 Mexico 8 compare
- 52 Myanmar 8 compare
- 52 Philippines 8 compare
- 52 Serbia 8 compare
- 52 Solomon Islands 8 compare
- 52 South Korea 8 compare
- 52 United Kingdom 8 compare
More social development data for Brazil
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 278,966 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 6,306 (2025)
- Political Rights Rating 2 (2025)
- Electoral democracy 1 (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, gaps filled 2 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 6,306 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0013 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is democracy index in Brazil?
- Democracy index in Brazil was 8 in 2018, according to Polity 5 (2020); Population based on various sources (2023) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest democracy index recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 8 in 1988.
- What is the lowest democracy index recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was -9 in 1965.
- How does Brazil rank for democracy index?
- Brazil ranks 52nd out of 168 countries with data for 2018.
- Is democracy index rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from Polity 5 (2020); Population based on various sources (2023) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Democracy Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 195 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
It combines information on the extent to which open, multi-party, and competitive elections choose a chief executive who faces comprehensive institutional constraints, and political participation is competitive. It ranges from -10 to 10 (fully democratic).