Jordan vs Rwanda: Participatory Democracy Index
Jordan
0.132
in 2025
Rwanda
0.13
in 2025
Jordan rank
128th
Rwanda rank
129th
Participatory Democracy Index over time
- Jordan
- Rwanda
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0.132 against 0.13 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.002.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 128th and Rwanda ranks 129th of 176 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 4 and Rwanda in 7.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0.0372 | 0.024 | 0.0132 | Jordan |
| 1930s | 0.041 | 0.024 | 0.017 | Jordan |
| 1940s | 0.0434 | 0.024 | 0.0194 | Jordan |
| 1950s | 0.0564 | 0.0256 | 0.0308 | Jordan |
| 1960s | 0.05 | 0.1059 | 0.0559 | Rwanda |
| 1970s | 0.0493 | 0.0771 | 0.0278 | Rwanda |
| 1980s | 0.0558 | 0.0676 | 0.0118 | Rwanda |
| 1990s | 0.0788 | 0.0964 | 0.0176 | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 0.0816 | 0.1626 | 0.081 | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0.1098 | 0.1932 | 0.0834 | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0.1228 | 0.151 | 0.0282 | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher participatory democracy index, Jordan or Rwanda?
- Jordan, at 0.132 against 0.13 in Rwanda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in participatory democracy index between Jordan and Rwanda?
- 0.002, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Rwanda?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
- How do Jordan and Rwanda rank globally for participatory democracy index?
- Jordan ranks 128th and Rwanda ranks 129th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Participatory Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which citizens can engage in regional and local government, civil society organizations, and direct democracy.