Nepal vs Peru: Deliberative Democracy Index

Nepal
0.406
in 2025
Peru
0.377
in 2025
Nepal rank
73rd
Peru rank
76th

Deliberative Democracy Index over time

  • Nepal
  • Peru
00.20.40.60.8190019622025

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 0.406 against 0.377 in Peru, a difference of 0.029.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Peru ahead.

Nepal ranks 73rd and Peru ranks 76th of 175 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 11.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Peru Difference Ahead
1900s 0.003 0.1223 0.1193 Peru
1910s 0.003 0.0889 0.0859 Peru
1920s 0.003 0.0631 0.0601 Peru
1930s 0.003 0.0582 0.0552 Peru
1940s 0.003 0.0768 0.0738 Peru
1950s 0.1339 0.091 0.0429 Nepal
1960s 0.0754 0.1684 0.093 Peru
1970s 0.057 0.061 0.004 Peru
1980s 0.0702 0.4736 0.4034 Peru
1990s 0.314 0.2134 0.1006 Nepal
2000s 0.256 0.6326 0.3766 Peru
2010s 0.4057 0.6335 0.2278 Peru
2020s 0.398 0.4632 0.0652 Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Nepal or Peru?
Nepal, at 0.406 against 0.377 in Peru as of 2025.
What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Nepal and Peru?
0.029, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Peru?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Nepal and Peru rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
Nepal ranks 73rd and Peru ranks 76th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Deliberative Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,734 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.