Physical Integrity Rights Score in Liechtenstein
Liechtenstein: Physical Integrity Rights Score was 4.62 in 2019. ▲ Rising
Physical Integrity Rights Score in Liechtenstein, 1990–2019
Source: Fariss et al. (2020) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2019, physical integrity rights score in Liechtenstein stood at 4.62. That is the highest value across all 30 years on record.
That represents a change of up 0.2% on the previous year and up 1.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, physical integrity rights score in Liechtenstein peaked at 4.62 in 2019 and was at its lowest, 1.82, in 1990.
That places Liechtenstein 3rd out of 193 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 30 years of available data.
Physical Integrity Rights Score in Liechtenstein, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 1.82 | — |
| 1991 | 1.99 | +9.1% |
| 1992 | 2.17 | +9.3% |
| 1993 | 2.39 | +10.2% |
| 1994 | 2.61 | +8.9% |
| 1995 | 2.77 | +6.2% |
| 1996 | 2.94 | +6.3% |
| 1997 | 3.17 | +7.7% |
| 1998 | 3.36 | +6.1% |
| 1999 | 3.57 | +6.1% |
| 2000 | 3.73 | +4.6% |
| 2001 | 3.91 | +4.7% |
| 2002 | 4.04 | +3.5% |
| 2003 | 4.16 | +2.9% |
| 2004 | 4.24 | +2.0% |
| 2005 | 4.33 | +2.0% |
| 2006 | 4.4 | +1.7% |
| 2007 | 4.45 | +1.1% |
| 2008 | 4.5 | +1.2% |
| 2009 | 4.54 | +0.8% |
| 2010 | 4.56 | +0.4% |
| 2011 | 4.57 | +0.4% |
| 2012 | 4.58 | +0.2% |
| 2013 | 4.59 | +0.1% |
| 2014 | 4.6 | +0.3% |
| 2015 | 4.6 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 4.6 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 4.6 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 4.61 | +0.3% |
| 2019 | 4.62 | +0.2% |
Liechtenstein compared with similar countries
- Liechtenstein's 4.62 is above the median for high income countries, which is 2.22, 2.1× the median. (64 countries reporting)
- Liechtenstein's 4.62 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1.75, 2.6× the median. (52 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.68 | 1.82 | 3.57 | 10 |
| 2000s | 4.23 | 3.73 | 4.54 | 10 |
| 2010s | 4.59 | 4.56 | 4.62 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Liechtenstein
More social development data for Liechtenstein
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 987 (2025)
- Political Rights Rating 2 (2025)
- Electoral democracy 0 (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, gaps filled 2 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0241 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 17.36 % change on previous year (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 987 (2025)
- Sovereign state gleditsch ward, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is physical integrity rights score in Liechtenstein?
- Physical integrity rights score in Liechtenstein was 4.62 in 2019, according to Fariss et al. (2020) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest physical integrity rights score recorded in Liechtenstein?
- The highest recorded value was 4.62 in 2019.
- What is the lowest physical integrity rights score recorded in Liechtenstein?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.82 in 1990.
- How does Liechtenstein rank for physical integrity rights score?
- Liechtenstein ranks 3rd out of 193 countries with data for 2019.
- Is physical integrity rights score rising or falling in Liechtenstein?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Liechtenstein data come from?
- The figures come from Fariss et al. (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 30 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.