Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Latvia
Latvia: Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate was -1.05 % change on previous year in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
-1.05 % change on previous year
Change on year
down 167.7%
World rank
101st
of 176 countries
All-time high
606.25 % change on previous year
in 1990
All-time low
-90.07 % change on previous year
in 1940
Years of data
235
1790–2025
Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Latvia, 1790–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2025, key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Latvia stood at -1.05 % change on previous year.
The figure is down 167.7% on the previous year and down 231.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Latvia peaked at 606.25 % change on previous year in 1990 and was at its lowest, -90.07 % change on previous year, in 1940.
That places Latvia 101st out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Latvia, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1790 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1791 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1792 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1793 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1794 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1795 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1796 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1797 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1798 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1799 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1800 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1801 | 7.14 % change on previous year | — |
| 1802 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1803 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1804 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1805 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1806 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1807 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1808 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1809 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1810 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1811 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1812 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1813 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1814 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1815 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1816 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1817 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1818 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1819 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1820 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1821 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1822 | -6.67 % change on previous year | — |
| 1823 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1824 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1825 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1826 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1827 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1828 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1829 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1830 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1831 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1832 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1833 | 7.14 % change on previous year | — |
| 1834 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1835 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1836 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1837 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1838 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1839 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1840 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1841 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1842 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1843 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1844 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1845 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1846 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1847 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1848 | 6.67 % change on previous year | — |
| 1849 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1850 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1851 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1852 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1853 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1854 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1855 | 68.75 % change on previous year | — |
| 1856 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1857 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1858 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1859 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1860 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1861 | 14.81 % change on previous year | — |
| 1862 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1863 | 3.23 % change on previous year | — |
| 1864 | 112.5 % change on previous year | +3387.5% |
| 1865 | 19.12 % change on previous year | -83.0% |
| 1866 | 12.35 % change on previous year | -35.4% |
| 1867 | 1.1 % change on previous year | -91.1% |
| 1868 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1869 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1870 | 1.09 % change on previous year | — |
| 1871 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1872 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1873 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1874 | 3.23 % change on previous year | — |
| 1875 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1876 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1877 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1878 | -42.71 % change on previous year | — |
| 1879 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1880 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1881 | -29.09 % change on previous year | — |
| 1882 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1883 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1884 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1885 | 2.56 % change on previous year | — |
| 1886 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1887 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1888 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1889 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1890 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1891 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1892 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1893 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1894 | 15 % change on previous year | — |
| 1895 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1896 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1897 | -2.17 % change on previous year | — |
| 1898 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1899 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1900 | -15.56 % change on previous year | — |
| 1901 | 2.63 % change on previous year | -116.9% |
| 1902 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1903 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1904 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1905 | -2.56 % change on previous year | — |
| 1906 | 57.89 % change on previous year | -2357.9% |
| 1907 | 5 % change on previous year | -91.4% |
| 1908 | 12.7 % change on previous year | +154.0% |
| 1909 | 2.82 % change on previous year | -77.8% |
| 1910 | -1.37 % change on previous year | -148.6% |
| 1911 | 2.78 % change on previous year | -302.8% |
| 1912 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1913 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1914 | -2.7 % change on previous year | — |
| 1915 | -2.78 % change on previous year | +2.8% |
| 1916 | -1.43 % change on previous year | -48.6% |
| 1917 | -8.7 % change on previous year | +508.7% |
| 1918 | -55.56 % change on previous year | +538.9% |
| 1919 | -21.43 % change on previous year | -61.4% |
| 1921 | 0.3953 % change on previous year | -101.8% |
| 1922 | 20.08 % change on previous year | +4979.9% |
| 1923 | 99.34 % change on previous year | +394.8% |
| 1924 | 0.8224 % change on previous year | -99.2% |
| 1925 | -0.1631 % change on previous year | -119.8% |
| 1926 | -0.1634 % change on previous year | +0.2% |
| 1927 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1928 | -0.1637 % change on previous year | — |
| 1929 | -0.9836 % change on previous year | +501.0% |
| 1930 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1931 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1932 | 0.1656 % change on previous year | — |
| 1933 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1934 | -59.17 % change on previous year | — |
| 1935 | -42.51 % change on previous year | -28.2% |
| 1936 | -0.7042 % change on previous year | -98.3% |
| 1937 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1938 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1939 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1940 | -90.07 % change on previous year | — |
| 1941 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1942 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1943 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1944 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1945 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1946 | 7.14 % change on previous year | — |
| 1947 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1948 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1949 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1950 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1951 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1952 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1953 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1954 | 40 % change on previous year | — |
| 1955 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1956 | 4.76 % change on previous year | — |
| 1957 | 9.09 % change on previous year | +90.9% |
| 1958 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1959 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1960 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1961 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1962 | -4.17 % change on previous year | — |
| 1963 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1964 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1965 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1966 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1967 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1968 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1969 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1970 | 4.35 % change on previous year | — |
| 1971 | 4.17 % change on previous year | -4.2% |
| 1972 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1973 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1974 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1975 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1976 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1977 | -4 % change on previous year | — |
| 1978 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1979 | 4.17 % change on previous year | — |
| 1980 | 12 % change on previous year | +188.0% |
| 1981 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1982 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1983 | -3.57 % change on previous year | — |
| 1984 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1985 | 7.41 % change on previous year | — |
| 1986 | 27.59 % change on previous year | +272.4% |
| 1987 | 10.81 % change on previous year | -60.8% |
| 1988 | 4.88 % change on previous year | -54.9% |
| 1989 | 48.84 % change on previous year | +901.2% |
| 1990 | 606.25 % change on previous year | +1141.4% |
| 1991 | 9.51 % change on previous year | -98.4% |
| 1992 | 13.33 % change on previous year | +40.2% |
| 1993 | 12.12 % change on previous year | -9.1% |
| 1994 | 8.11 % change on previous year | -33.1% |
| 1995 | -1.47 % change on previous year | -118.1% |
| 1996 | 0.597 % change on previous year | -140.6% |
| 1997 | 2.97 % change on previous year | +397.0% |
| 1998 | 0.2882 % change on previous year | -90.3% |
| 1999 | 0.7184 % change on previous year | +149.3% |
| 2000 | 0.1427 % change on previous year | -80.1% |
| 2001 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2002 | 0.4274 % change on previous year | — |
| 2003 | 1.28 % change on previous year | +198.7% |
| 2004 | 0.1401 % change on previous year | -89.0% |
| 2005 | -0.6993 % change on previous year | -599.3% |
| 2006 | -0.9859 % change on previous year | +41.0% |
| 2007 | -2.56 % change on previous year | +159.7% |
| 2008 | 0.146 % change on previous year | -105.7% |
| 2009 | 1.17 % change on previous year | +698.8% |
| 2010 | 1.44 % change on previous year | +23.6% |
| 2011 | 2.7 % change on previous year | +87.3% |
| 2012 | 0.6916 % change on previous year | -74.4% |
| 2013 | 2.06 % change on previous year | +197.9% |
| 2014 | 0.6729 % change on previous year | -67.3% |
| 2015 | 0.8021 % change on previous year | +19.2% |
| 2016 | -0.7958 % change on previous year | -199.2% |
| 2017 | -0.5348 % change on previous year | -32.8% |
| 2018 | 0.1344 % change on previous year | -125.1% |
| 2019 | -0.5369 % change on previous year | -499.5% |
| 2020 | -0.5398 % change on previous year | +0.5% |
| 2021 | 0.4071 % change on previous year | -175.4% |
| 2022 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2023 | 2.97 % change on previous year | — |
| 2024 | -0.3937 % change on previous year | -113.2% |
| 2025 | -1.05 % change on previous year | +167.7% |
Latvia compared with similar countries
- Latvia's -1.05 % change on previous year is below the median for high income countries, which is -0.4071 % change on previous year, 2.6× the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Latvia's -1.05 % change on previous year is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is -0.5842 % change on previous year, 1.8× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Latvia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1922 | +4979.9% | 0.3953 % change on previous year | 20.08 % change on previous year |
| 1864 | +3387.5% | 3.23 % change on previous year | 112.5 % change on previous year |
| 1906 | +2357.9% | -2.56 % change on previous year | 57.89 % change on previous year |
| 1990 | +1141.4% | 48.84 % change on previous year | 606.25 % change on previous year |
| 1989 | +901.2% | 4.88 % change on previous year | 48.84 % change on previous year |
| 2009 | +698.8% | 0.146 % change on previous year | 1.17 % change on previous year |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1790s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.7143 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 7.14 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1810s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1820s | -0.6667 % change on previous year | -6.67 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.7143 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 7.14 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.6667 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 6.67 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1850s | 6.88 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 68.75 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1860s | 16.31 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 112.5 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1870s | -3.84 % change on previous year | -42.71 % change on previous year | 3.23 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1880s | -2.65 % change on previous year | -29.09 % change on previous year | 2.56 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1890s | 1.28 % change on previous year | -2.17 % change on previous year | 15 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1900s | 6.29 % change on previous year | -15.56 % change on previous year | 57.89 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1910s | -9.12 % change on previous year | -55.56 % change on previous year | 2.78 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1920s | 13.24 % change on previous year | -0.9836 % change on previous year | 99.34 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1930s | -10.22 % change on previous year | -59.17 % change on previous year | 0.1656 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1940s | -8.29 % change on previous year | -90.07 % change on previous year | 7.14 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1950s | 5.39 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 40 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1960s | -0.4167 % change on previous year | -4.17 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.8681 % change on previous year | -4 % change on previous year | 4.35 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 10.79 % change on previous year | -3.57 % change on previous year | 48.84 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 65.24 % change on previous year | -1.47 % change on previous year | 606.25 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | -0.0947 % change on previous year | -2.56 % change on previous year | 1.28 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.6634 % change on previous year | -0.7958 % change on previous year | 2.7 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.2321 % change on previous year | -1.05 % change on previous year | 2.97 % change on previous year | 6 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
- 98 Barbados -0.8759 % change on previous year compare
- 99 Nigeria -0.9554 % change on previous year compare
- 100 Ireland -0.9639 % change on previous year compare
- 102 Canada -1.08 % change on previous year compare
- 103 Rwanda -1.1 % change on previous year compare
- 104 Malaysia -1.11 % change on previous year compare
More social development data for Latvia
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 32,454 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 189 (2025)
- Political Rights Rating 1 (2025)
- Electoral democracy 1 (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, gaps filled 1 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0001 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 189 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0176 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Latvia?
- Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Latvia was -1.05 % change on previous year in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 606.25 % change on previous year in 1990.
- What is the lowest key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was -90.07 % change on previous year in 1940.
- How does Latvia rank for key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate?
- Latvia ranks 101st out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 231.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 235 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Key features of liberal democracy. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Key features of liberal democracy V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Key features of liberal democracy. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.