Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Ecuador
Ecuador: Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate was -12.87 % change on previous year in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
-12.87 % change on previous year
Change on year
down 197.9%
World rank
170th
of 176 countries
All-time high
226.12 % change on previous year
in 1980
All-time low
-69.19 % change on previous year
in 1963
Years of data
195
1831–2025
Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Ecuador, 1831–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2025, key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Ecuador stood at -12.87 % change on previous year.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 197.9% on the previous year and down 3,471.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Ecuador peaked at 226.12 % change on previous year in 1980 and was at its lowest, -69.19 % change on previous year, in 1963.
Ecuador ranks 170th of 176 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1831 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1832 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1833 | -3.03 % change on previous year | — |
| 1834 | 18.75 % change on previous year | -718.8% |
| 1835 | 15.79 % change on previous year | -15.8% |
| 1836 | 9.09 % change on previous year | -42.4% |
| 1837 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1838 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1839 | -25 % change on previous year | — |
| 1840 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1841 | -5.56 % change on previous year | — |
| 1842 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1843 | -2.94 % change on previous year | — |
| 1844 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1845 | 124.24 % change on previous year | — |
| 1846 | 27.03 % change on previous year | -78.2% |
| 1847 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1848 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1849 | -6.38 % change on previous year | — |
| 1850 | -2.27 % change on previous year | -64.4% |
| 1851 | 5.81 % change on previous year | -355.8% |
| 1852 | -12.09 % change on previous year | -307.9% |
| 1853 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1854 | 7.5 % change on previous year | — |
| 1855 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1856 | 9.3 % change on previous year | — |
| 1857 | 10.64 % change on previous year | +14.4% |
| 1858 | 6.73 % change on previous year | -36.7% |
| 1859 | -44.14 % change on previous year | -755.9% |
| 1860 | -33.87 % change on previous year | -23.3% |
| 1861 | -12.2 % change on previous year | -64.0% |
| 1862 | 19.44 % change on previous year | -259.4% |
| 1863 | 2.33 % change on previous year | -88.0% |
| 1864 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1865 | 47.73 % change on previous year | — |
| 1866 | 20 % change on previous year | -58.1% |
| 1867 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1868 | -1.28 % change on previous year | — |
| 1869 | -36.36 % change on previous year | +2736.4% |
| 1870 | -12.24 % change on previous year | -66.3% |
| 1871 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1872 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1873 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1874 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1875 | 62.79 % change on previous year | — |
| 1876 | 32.86 % change on previous year | -47.7% |
| 1877 | -30.11 % change on previous year | -191.6% |
| 1878 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1879 | 21.54 % change on previous year | — |
| 1880 | 1.27 % change on previous year | -94.1% |
| 1881 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1882 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1883 | -25 % change on previous year | — |
| 1884 | 3.33 % change on previous year | -113.3% |
| 1885 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1886 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1887 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1888 | 41.94 % change on previous year | — |
| 1889 | 5.68 % change on previous year | -86.5% |
| 1890 | 8.6 % change on previous year | +51.4% |
| 1891 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1892 | 18.81 % change on previous year | — |
| 1893 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1894 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1895 | 4.17 % change on previous year | — |
| 1896 | 20 % change on previous year | +380.0% |
| 1897 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1898 | 14.67 % change on previous year | — |
| 1899 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1900 | 2.33 % change on previous year | — |
| 1901 | -9.09 % change on previous year | -490.9% |
| 1902 | -0.625 % change on previous year | -93.1% |
| 1903 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1904 | 1.26 % change on previous year | — |
| 1905 | -1.24 % change on previous year | -198.8% |
| 1906 | -10.69 % change on previous year | +760.7% |
| 1907 | -1.41 % change on previous year | -86.8% |
| 1908 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1909 | 1.43 % change on previous year | — |
| 1910 | -4.23 % change on previous year | -395.8% |
| 1911 | 11.03 % change on previous year | -361.0% |
| 1912 | 8.61 % change on previous year | -21.9% |
| 1913 | -4.27 % change on previous year | -149.6% |
| 1914 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1915 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1916 | -10.19 % change on previous year | — |
| 1917 | 0.7092 % change on previous year | -107.0% |
| 1918 | -1.41 % change on previous year | -298.6% |
| 1919 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1920 | -10.71 % change on previous year | — |
| 1921 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1922 | -1.6 % change on previous year | — |
| 1923 | 1.63 % change on previous year | -201.6% |
| 1924 | -0.8 % change on previous year | -149.2% |
| 1925 | -8.87 % change on previous year | +1008.9% |
| 1926 | -2.65 % change on previous year | -70.1% |
| 1927 | 3.64 % change on previous year | -237.0% |
| 1928 | 0.8772 % change on previous year | -75.9% |
| 1929 | 9.57 % change on previous year | +990.4% |
| 1930 | 5.56 % change on previous year | -41.9% |
| 1931 | -1.5 % change on previous year | -127.1% |
| 1932 | -3.82 % change on previous year | +153.8% |
| 1933 | 0.7937 % change on previous year | -120.8% |
| 1934 | 1.57 % change on previous year | +98.4% |
| 1935 | -46.51 % change on previous year | -3053.5% |
| 1936 | -10.14 % change on previous year | -78.2% |
| 1937 | -1.61 % change on previous year | -84.1% |
| 1938 | 18.03 % change on previous year | -1218.0% |
| 1939 | 70.83 % change on previous year | +292.8% |
| 1940 | -15.45 % change on previous year | -121.8% |
| 1941 | -0.9615 % change on previous year | -93.8% |
| 1942 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1943 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1944 | -5.83 % change on previous year | — |
| 1945 | 7.22 % change on previous year | -223.9% |
| 1946 | -5.77 % change on previous year | -179.9% |
| 1947 | 19.39 % change on previous year | -436.1% |
| 1948 | 48.72 % change on previous year | +151.3% |
| 1949 | 6.32 % change on previous year | -87.0% |
| 1950 | 1.62 % change on previous year | -74.3% |
| 1951 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1952 | -2.66 % change on previous year | — |
| 1953 | -2.19 % change on previous year | -17.8% |
| 1954 | 1.12 % change on previous year | -151.1% |
| 1955 | 2.76 % change on previous year | +147.2% |
| 1956 | -0.5376 % change on previous year | -119.5% |
| 1957 | 1.08 % change on previous year | -301.1% |
| 1958 | 1.6 % change on previous year | +48.4% |
| 1959 | 0.5263 % change on previous year | -67.2% |
| 1960 | -3.66 % change on previous year | -796.3% |
| 1961 | -1.63 % change on previous year | -55.5% |
| 1962 | 2.21 % change on previous year | -235.5% |
| 1963 | -69.19 % change on previous year | -3230.8% |
| 1964 | 1.75 % change on previous year | -102.5% |
| 1965 | 5.17 % change on previous year | +194.8% |
| 1966 | 6.56 % change on previous year | +26.8% |
| 1967 | 87.69 % change on previous year | +1237.3% |
| 1968 | 24.59 % change on previous year | -72.0% |
| 1969 | 26.97 % change on previous year | +9.7% |
| 1970 | -53.37 % change on previous year | -297.9% |
| 1971 | -2.22 % change on previous year | -95.8% |
| 1972 | -17.05 % change on previous year | +667.0% |
| 1973 | -13.7 % change on previous year | -19.6% |
| 1974 | 3.17 % change on previous year | -123.2% |
| 1975 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1976 | 1.54 % change on previous year | — |
| 1977 | 6.06 % change on previous year | +293.9% |
| 1978 | 20 % change on previous year | +230.0% |
| 1979 | 59.52 % change on previous year | +197.6% |
| 1980 | 226.12 % change on previous year | +279.9% |
| 1981 | 0.2288 % change on previous year | -99.9% |
| 1982 | 0.4566 % change on previous year | +99.5% |
| 1983 | -0.2273 % change on previous year | -149.8% |
| 1984 | -3.64 % change on previous year | +1503.6% |
| 1985 | -5.44 % change on previous year | +49.2% |
| 1986 | 0.75 % change on previous year | -113.8% |
| 1987 | -0.2481 % change on previous year | -133.1% |
| 1988 | 6.97 % change on previous year | -2907.0% |
| 1989 | 8.84 % change on previous year | +26.9% |
| 1990 | -0.2137 % change on previous year | -102.4% |
| 1991 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1992 | -0.2141 % change on previous year | — |
| 1993 | -2.15 % change on previous year | +902.1% |
| 1994 | -1.32 % change on previous year | -38.7% |
| 1995 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1996 | -2 % change on previous year | — |
| 1997 | 2.04 % change on previous year | -202.0% |
| 1998 | 2 % change on previous year | -2.0% |
| 1999 | -1.09 % change on previous year | -154.5% |
| 2000 | -1.98 % change on previous year | +82.0% |
| 2001 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2002 | 0.2247 % change on previous year | — |
| 2003 | 1.79 % change on previous year | +698.2% |
| 2004 | -0.4405 % change on previous year | -124.6% |
| 2005 | 0.4425 % change on previous year | -200.4% |
| 2006 | -0.6608 % change on previous year | -249.3% |
| 2007 | -9.76 % change on previous year | +1376.4% |
| 2008 | -15.72 % change on previous year | +61.2% |
| 2009 | -4.08 % change on previous year | -74.0% |
| 2010 | -6.08 % change on previous year | +48.9% |
| 2011 | -1.62 % change on previous year | -73.4% |
| 2012 | 0.6579 % change on previous year | -140.7% |
| 2013 | -13.4 % change on previous year | -2136.6% |
| 2014 | -1.13 % change on previous year | -91.6% |
| 2015 | 0.3817 % change on previous year | -133.7% |
| 2016 | 0.3802 % change on previous year | -0.4% |
| 2017 | 28.03 % change on previous year | +7272.0% |
| 2018 | 35.5 % change on previous year | +26.7% |
| 2019 | -2.62 % change on previous year | -107.4% |
| 2020 | 7.85 % change on previous year | -399.5% |
| 2021 | -5.61 % change on previous year | -171.5% |
| 2022 | 11.01 % change on previous year | -296.2% |
| 2023 | -8.13 % change on previous year | -173.9% |
| 2024 | -4.32 % change on previous year | -46.9% |
| 2025 | -12.87 % change on previous year | +197.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1830s | 1.73 % change on previous year | -25 % change on previous year | 18.75 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1840s | 13.64 % change on previous year | -6.38 % change on previous year | 124.24 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1850s | -1.85 % change on previous year | -44.14 % change on previous year | 10.64 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.5786 % change on previous year | -36.36 % change on previous year | 47.73 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1870s | 7.48 % change on previous year | -30.11 % change on previous year | 62.79 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1880s | 2.72 % change on previous year | -25 % change on previous year | 41.94 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1890s | 6.62 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 20 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1900s | -1.8 % change on previous year | -10.69 % change on previous year | 2.33 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.0255 % change on previous year | -10.19 % change on previous year | 11.03 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1920s | -0.8935 % change on previous year | -10.71 % change on previous year | 9.57 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1930s | 3.32 % change on previous year | -46.51 % change on previous year | 70.83 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1940s | 5.36 % change on previous year | -15.45 % change on previous year | 48.72 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.333 % change on previous year | -2.66 % change on previous year | 2.76 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1960s | 8.05 % change on previous year | -69.19 % change on previous year | 87.69 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.3963 % change on previous year | -53.37 % change on previous year | 59.52 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 23.38 % change on previous year | -5.44 % change on previous year | 226.12 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | -0.2938 % change on previous year | -2.15 % change on previous year | 2.04 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | -3.02 % change on previous year | -15.72 % change on previous year | 1.79 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 4.01 % change on previous year | -13.4 % change on previous year | 35.5 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -2.01 % change on previous year | -12.87 % change on previous year | 11.01 % change on previous year | 6 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 167 Mexico -10.16 % change on previous year compare
- 168 Republic of Moldova -10.74 % change on previous year compare
- 169 Indonesia -10.84 % change on previous year compare
- 171 Georgia -15.9 % change on previous year compare
- 172 Tanzania, United Republic of -16.81 % change on previous year compare
- 173 Burkina Faso -18.25 % change on previous year compare
More social development data for Ecuador
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 26,428 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 5,723 (2025)
- Political rights rating fh 3 (2025)
- Democracy lexical 1 (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, gaps filled 3 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0003 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 5,723 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0014 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Ecuador?
- Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate in Ecuador was -12.87 % change on previous year in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 226.12 % change on previous year in 1980.
- What is the lowest key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was -69.19 % change on previous year in 1963.
- How does Ecuador rank for key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate?
- Ecuador ranks 170th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 3,471.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Key features of liberal democracy, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 195 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Key features of liberal democracy. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Key features of liberal democracy Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Key features of liberal democracy. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.