Judicial Corruption Score in Netherlands
Netherlands: Judicial Corruption Score was 2.33 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Judicial Corruption Score in Netherlands, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, judicial corruption score in Netherlands stood at 2.33.
The figure is down 30.2% on the previous year and down 17.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, judicial corruption score in Netherlands peaked at 3.48 in 2018 and was at its lowest, -0.988, in 1813.
That places Netherlands 16th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 235 years of available data.
Judicial Corruption Score in Netherlands, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 1.84 | — |
| 1790 | 1.84 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 1.84 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 1.84 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 1.84 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 1.84 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | -0.972 | -152.7% |
| 1796 | -0.972 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -0.972 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -0.972 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -0.972 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -0.972 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -0.972 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -0.972 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -0.972 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -0.972 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -0.972 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -0.972 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -0.972 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -0.972 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -0.972 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -0.972 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -0.988 | +1.6% |
| 1814 | -0.988 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | 2.16 | -318.6% |
| 1816 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 2.16 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 2.85 | +32.1% |
| 1941 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 2.85 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 2.14 | -24.9% |
| 2014 | 2.14 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 2.81 | +31.2% |
| 2016 | 2.81 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2.81 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3.48 | +23.8% |
| 2019 | 3.48 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 2.67 | -23.4% |
| 2021 | 2.67 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 2.67 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 2.67 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 3.34 | +25.3% |
| 2025 | 2.33 | -30.2% |
Netherlands compared with similar countries
- Netherlands's 2.33 is above the median for high income countries, which is 1.71, 1.4× the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Netherlands's 2.33 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1.02, 2.3× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 1.84 | 1.84 | 1.84 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.436 | -0.972 | 1.84 | 10 |
| 1800s | -0.972 | -0.972 | -0.972 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.9815 | -0.988 | 2.16 | 8 |
| 1820s | 2.16 | 2.16 | 2.16 | 10 |
| 1830s | 2.16 | 2.16 | 2.16 | 10 |
| 1840s | 2.16 | 2.16 | 2.16 | 10 |
| 1850s | 2.16 | 2.16 | 2.16 | 10 |
| 1860s | 2.16 | 2.16 | 2.16 | 10 |
| 1870s | 2.16 | 2.16 | 2.16 | 10 |
| 1880s | 2.16 | 2.16 | 2.16 | 10 |
| 1890s | 2.16 | 2.16 | 2.16 | 10 |
| 1900s | 2.16 | 2.16 | 2.16 | 10 |
| 1910s | 2.16 | 2.16 | 2.16 | 10 |
| 1920s | 2.16 | 2.16 | 2.16 | 10 |
| 1930s | 2.16 | 2.16 | 2.16 | 10 |
| 1940s | 2.85 | 2.85 | 2.85 | 10 |
| 1950s | 2.85 | 2.85 | 2.85 | 10 |
| 1960s | 2.85 | 2.85 | 2.85 | 10 |
| 1970s | 2.85 | 2.85 | 2.85 | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.85 | 2.85 | 2.85 | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.85 | 2.85 | 2.85 | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.85 | 2.85 | 2.85 | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.82 | 2.14 | 3.48 | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.72 | 2.33 | 3.34 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Netherlands
More social development data for Netherlands
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 283,935 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 159 (2025)
- Political Rights Rating 1 (2025)
- Electoral democracy 1 (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, gaps filled 1 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 159 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0157 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is judicial corruption score in Netherlands?
- Judicial corruption score in Netherlands was 2.33 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest judicial corruption score recorded in Netherlands?
- The highest recorded value was 3.48 in 2018.
- What is the lowest judicial corruption score recorded in Netherlands?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.988 in 1813.
- How does Netherlands rank for judicial corruption score?
- Netherlands ranks 16th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is judicial corruption score rising or falling in Netherlands?
- Over the last ten years it is down 17.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Netherlands data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Judicial Corruption Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 235 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of how often individuals or businesses make undocumented extra payments or bribes to obtain a favorable judicial decision, or speed up or delay the process. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.