Judicial Corruption Score in Austria
Austria: Judicial Corruption Score was 2.3 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Judicial Corruption Score in Austria, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, judicial corruption score in Austria stood at 2.3. That is the highest value across all 230 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, judicial corruption score in Austria peaked at 2.3 in 1945 and was at its lowest, 2.21, in 1789.
Austria ranks 18th of 176 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 230 years of available data.
Judicial Corruption Score in Austria, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 2.21 | — |
| 1790 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 2.21 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 2.3 | +4.2% |
| 1946 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 2.3 | +0.0% |
Austria compared with similar countries
- Austria's 2.3 is above the median for high income countries, which is 1.71, 1.3× the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Austria's 2.3 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1.02, 2.3× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 2.21 | 2.21 | 2.21 | 1 |
| 1790s | 2.21 | 2.21 | 2.21 | 10 |
| 1800s | 2.21 | 2.21 | 2.21 | 10 |
| 1810s | 2.21 | 2.21 | 2.21 | 10 |
| 1820s | 2.21 | 2.21 | 2.21 | 10 |
| 1830s | 2.21 | 2.21 | 2.21 | 10 |
| 1840s | 2.21 | 2.21 | 2.21 | 10 |
| 1850s | 2.21 | 2.21 | 2.21 | 10 |
| 1860s | 2.21 | 2.21 | 2.21 | 10 |
| 1870s | 2.21 | 2.21 | 2.21 | 10 |
| 1880s | 2.21 | 2.21 | 2.21 | 10 |
| 1890s | 2.21 | 2.21 | 2.21 | 10 |
| 1900s | 2.21 | 2.21 | 2.21 | 10 |
| 1910s | 2.21 | 2.21 | 2.21 | 10 |
| 1920s | 2.21 | 2.21 | 2.21 | 10 |
| 1930s | 2.21 | 2.21 | 2.21 | 8 |
| 1940s | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 5 |
| 1950s | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 10 |
| 1960s | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 10 |
| 1970s | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Austria
More social development data for Austria
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 286,651 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 33 (2025)
- Political Rights Rating 1 (2025)
- Electoral democracy 1 (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, gaps filled 1 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 33 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0311 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is judicial corruption score in Austria?
- Judicial corruption score in Austria was 2.3 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest judicial corruption score recorded in Austria?
- The highest recorded value was 2.3 in 1945.
- What is the lowest judicial corruption score recorded in Austria?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.21 in 1789.
- How does Austria rank for judicial corruption score?
- Austria ranks 18th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is judicial corruption score rising or falling in Austria?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Austria data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Judicial Corruption Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 230 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of how often individuals or businesses make undocumented extra payments or bribes to obtain a favorable judicial decision, or speed up or delay the process. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.