Executive Corruption Index in South Korea
South Korea: Executive Corruption Index was 0.078 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Executive Corruption Index in South Korea, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, executive corruption index in South Korea stood at 0.078.
The figure is down 79.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, executive corruption index in South Korea peaked at 0.735 in 1948 and was at its lowest, 0.037, in 2022.
South Korea ranks 147th of 176 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 237 years of available data.
Executive Corruption Index in South Korea, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.666 | — |
| 1790 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.666 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.654 | -1.8% |
| 1911 | 0.622 | -4.9% |
| 1912 | 0.622 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.622 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.622 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.622 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.622 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.622 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.622 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 0.622 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.622 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 0.622 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.622 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.622 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.622 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.622 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.622 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.622 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.622 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.622 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.622 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.622 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.622 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.622 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.622 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.622 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.622 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.622 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.622 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.622 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.622 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 0.622 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.622 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.622 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.622 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.605 | -2.7% |
| 1946 | 0.605 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 0.605 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.735 | +21.5% |
| 1949 | 0.735 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.735 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.735 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.735 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 0.735 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 0.735 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 0.735 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.735 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.735 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.735 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 0.735 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 0.509 | -30.7% |
| 1961 | 0.527 | +3.5% |
| 1962 | 0.613 | +16.3% |
| 1963 | 0.613 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.613 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.613 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.613 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.613 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.613 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.613 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.613 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.613 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.646 | +5.4% |
| 1973 | 0.646 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.646 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.646 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.646 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.646 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.646 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.646 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.667 | +3.3% |
| 1981 | 0.667 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.667 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.667 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.667 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.667 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.667 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.667 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.619 | -7.2% |
| 1989 | 0.619 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.619 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.619 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.551 | -11.0% |
| 1993 | 0.361 | -34.5% |
| 1994 | 0.361 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.361 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.361 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.361 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.233 | -35.5% |
| 1999 | 0.229 | -1.7% |
| 2000 | 0.205 | -10.5% |
| 2001 | 0.205 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.195 | -4.9% |
| 2003 | 0.113 | -42.1% |
| 2004 | 0.082 | -27.4% |
| 2005 | 0.082 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.082 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.082 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.219 | +167.1% |
| 2009 | 0.219 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.219 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.219 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.281 | +28.3% |
| 2013 | 0.339 | +20.6% |
| 2014 | 0.339 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0.386 | +13.9% |
| 2016 | 0.386 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 0.072 | -81.3% |
| 2018 | 0.06 | -16.7% |
| 2019 | 0.046 | -23.3% |
| 2020 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.037 | -19.6% |
| 2023 | 0.071 | +91.9% |
| 2024 | 0.078 | +9.9% |
| 2025 | 0.078 | +0.0% |
South Korea compared with similar countries
- South Korea's 0.078 is above the median for high income countries, which is 0.078, 1.0× the median. (55 countries reporting)
- South Korea's 0.078 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0.45, 17% of the median. (22 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.666 | 0.666 | 0.666 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.666 | 0.666 | 0.666 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.666 | 0.666 | 0.666 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.666 | 0.666 | 0.666 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.666 | 0.666 | 0.666 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.666 | 0.666 | 0.666 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.666 | 0.666 | 0.666 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.666 | 0.666 | 0.666 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.666 | 0.666 | 0.666 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.666 | 0.666 | 0.666 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.666 | 0.666 | 0.666 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.666 | 0.666 | 0.666 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.666 | 0.666 | 0.666 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.6252 | 0.622 | 0.654 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.622 | 0.622 | 0.622 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.622 | 0.622 | 0.622 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.6395 | 0.605 | 0.735 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.735 | 0.735 | 0.735 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.594 | 0.509 | 0.613 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.6394 | 0.613 | 0.646 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.6574 | 0.619 | 0.667 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.4056 | 0.229 | 0.619 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.1484 | 0.082 | 0.219 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.2347 | 0.046 | 0.386 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0593 | 0.037 | 0.078 | 6 |
Countries ranked near South Korea
More social development data for South Korea
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 4,407 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 117 (2025)
- Political Rights Rating 2 (2025)
- Electoral democracy 1 (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, gaps filled 2 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 117 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0001 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is executive corruption index in South Korea?
- Executive corruption index in South Korea was 0.078 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest executive corruption index recorded in South Korea?
- The highest recorded value was 0.735 in 1948.
- What is the lowest executive corruption index recorded in South Korea?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.037 in 2022.
- How does South Korea rank for executive corruption index?
- South Korea ranks 147th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is executive corruption index rising or falling in South Korea?
- Over the last ten years it is down 79.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this South Korea data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Executive Corruption Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of the extent to which high-ranking members of the executive, such as the head of government or cabinet ministers, engage in bribery and theft. The index ranges from 0 to 1 (highly corrupt).