Executive Corruption Index in Chile
Chile: Executive Corruption Index was 0.044 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Executive Corruption Index in Chile, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for executive corruption index in Chile is 0.044, measured in 2025.
That represents a change of down 53.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, executive corruption index in Chile peaked at 0.713 in 1789 and was at its lowest, 0.026, in 1990.
Chile ranks 157th of 176 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Executive Corruption Index in Chile, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.713 | — |
| 1790 | 0.713 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.713 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.713 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.713 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.713 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.713 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.713 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.713 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.713 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.713 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.713 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.713 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.713 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.713 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.713 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.713 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.713 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.713 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.713 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.713 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.112 | -84.3% |
| 1811 | 0.112 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.112 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.112 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.112 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.112 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.112 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.218 | +94.6% |
| 1818 | 0.333 | +52.8% |
| 1819 | 0.333 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.22 | -33.9% |
| 1821 | 0.331 | +50.5% |
| 1822 | 0.331 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.213 | -35.6% |
| 1824 | 0.213 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.213 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.327 | +53.5% |
| 1827 | 0.327 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.327 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.327 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.218 | -33.3% |
| 1831 | 0.107 | -50.9% |
| 1832 | 0.107 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.107 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.107 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.107 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.107 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.107 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.107 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.107 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.107 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.107 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.107 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.107 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.107 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.107 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.107 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.107 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.107 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.107 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.107 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.107 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.107 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.107 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.107 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.107 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.107 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.107 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.107 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.107 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.083 | -22.4% |
| 1861 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.177 | +113.3% |
| 1872 | 0.177 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.177 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.177 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.177 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.177 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.177 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.177 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.177 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.177 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.177 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 0.177 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.177 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.177 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.177 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.177 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.177 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.177 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.177 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.177 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.177 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.28 | +58.2% |
| 1893 | 0.28 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.28 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.28 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.28 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.28 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.28 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.28 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 0.28 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 0.28 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.28 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.28 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.28 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.28 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.28 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 0.28 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 0.28 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.28 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.28 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 0.28 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.28 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.28 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.28 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.28 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.28 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.28 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.28 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 0.28 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.28 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 0.28 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.28 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.28 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.28 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.28 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.196 | -30.0% |
| 1927 | 0.196 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.196 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.196 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.196 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.196 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.127 | -35.2% |
| 1933 | 0.078 | -38.6% |
| 1934 | 0.078 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.078 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.078 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.078 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.078 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.078 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.078 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 0.078 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.078 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.118 | +51.3% |
| 1944 | 0.118 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.118 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.192 | +62.7% |
| 1947 | 0.192 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.192 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.192 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.192 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.192 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.156 | -18.8% |
| 1953 | 0.156 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 0.156 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 0.156 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.156 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.156 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.106 | -32.1% |
| 1959 | 0.078 | -26.4% |
| 1960 | 0.029 | -62.8% |
| 1961 | 0.029 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.029 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.029 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.029 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.029 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.029 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.029 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.029 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.029 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.029 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.029 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.029 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.182 | +527.6% |
| 1974 | 0.493 | +170.9% |
| 1975 | 0.454 | -7.9% |
| 1976 | 0.454 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.454 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.454 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.454 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.454 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.454 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.454 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.454 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.454 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.454 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.454 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.454 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.454 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.454 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.026 | -94.3% |
| 1991 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.04 | +53.8% |
| 2011 | 0.04 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.04 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.057 | +42.5% |
| 2014 | 0.067 | +17.5% |
| 2015 | 0.094 | +40.3% |
| 2016 | 0.094 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 0.094 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.044 | -53.2% |
| 2019 | 0.04 | -9.1% |
| 2020 | 0.04 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 0.044 | +10.0% |
| 2022 | 0.044 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.044 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 0.044 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 0.044 | +0.0% |
Chile compared with similar countries
- Chile's 0.044 is below the median for high income countries, which is 0.078, 56% of the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Chile's 0.044 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.501, 9% of the median. (25 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.713 | 0.713 | 0.713 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.713 | 0.713 | 0.713 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.713 | 0.713 | 0.713 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.1668 | 0.112 | 0.333 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.2829 | 0.213 | 0.331 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.1181 | 0.107 | 0.218 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.107 | 0.107 | 0.107 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.107 | 0.107 | 0.107 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.083 | 0.083 | 0.083 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.1676 | 0.083 | 0.177 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.177 | 0.177 | 0.177 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.2594 | 0.177 | 0.28 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.28 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.28 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.2464 | 0.196 | 0.28 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.1065 | 0.078 | 0.196 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.1356 | 0.078 | 0.192 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.1504 | 0.078 | 0.192 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.029 | 0.029 | 0.029 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.3032 | 0.029 | 0.493 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.454 | 0.454 | 0.454 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.026 | 0.026 | 0.026 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.026 | 0.026 | 0.026 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.061 | 0.04 | 0.094 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0433 | 0.04 | 0.044 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 154 Trinidad and Tobago 0.055 compare
- 155 Uruguay 0.052 compare
- 156 United Kingdom 0.046 compare
- 157 United States 0.044 compare
- 159 Taiwan 0.043 compare
- 160 Netherlands 0.036 compare
More social development data for Chile
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 2,631 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 5,358 (2025)
- Political Rights Rating 1 (2025)
- Electoral democracy 1 (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, gaps filled 1 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0003 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 5,358 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0001 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is executive corruption index in Chile?
- Executive corruption index in Chile was 0.044 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest executive corruption index recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 0.713 in 1789.
- What is the lowest executive corruption index recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.026 in 1990.
- How does Chile rank for executive corruption index?
- Chile ranks 157th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is executive corruption index rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is down 53.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Executive Corruption Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of the extent to which high-ranking members of the executive, such as the head of government or cabinet ministers, engage in bribery and theft. The index ranges from 0 to 1 (highly corrupt).