Equal Rights Protection Index in Latvia
Latvia: Equal Rights Protection Index was 0.958 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Equal Rights Protection Index in Latvia, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
Latvia recorded 0.958 for equal rights protection index in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.1% on the previous year and down 0.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, equal rights protection index in Latvia peaked at 0.964 in 2013 and was at its lowest, 0.037, in 1789.
Latvia ranks 6th of 176 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Equal Rights Protection Index in Latvia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.037 | — |
| 1790 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.048 | +29.7% |
| 1849 | 0.048 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.048 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.048 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.048 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.048 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.048 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.048 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.048 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.048 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.048 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.048 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.048 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.048 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.048 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.048 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.046 | -4.2% |
| 1865 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 0.057 | +23.9% |
| 1901 | 0.058 | +1.8% |
| 1902 | 0.06 | +3.4% |
| 1903 | 0.06 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.059 | -1.7% |
| 1905 | 0.06 | +1.7% |
| 1906 | 0.075 | +25.0% |
| 1907 | 0.08 | +6.7% |
| 1908 | 0.079 | -1.3% |
| 1909 | 0.076 | -3.8% |
| 1910 | 0.076 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 0.076 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.077 | +1.3% |
| 1913 | 0.077 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.082 | +6.5% |
| 1915 | 0.08 | -2.4% |
| 1916 | 0.077 | -3.8% |
| 1917 | 0.135 | +75.3% |
| 1918 | 0.431 | +219.3% |
| 1919 | 0.429 | -0.5% |
| 1920 | 0.793 | +84.8% |
| 1921 | 0.793 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.793 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.793 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.793 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.793 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.793 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.793 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.793 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.793 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.793 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.793 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.793 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.793 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.793 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.793 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.793 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.793 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.793 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.793 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.63 | -20.6% |
| 1941 | 0.63 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.63 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.63 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.63 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.63 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.63 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 0.63 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.63 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.63 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.63 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.63 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.63 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 0.63 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 0.675 | +7.1% |
| 1955 | 0.681 | +0.9% |
| 1956 | 0.681 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.681 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.676 | -0.7% |
| 1959 | 0.668 | -1.2% |
| 1960 | 0.668 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.67 | +0.3% |
| 1962 | 0.672 | +0.3% |
| 1963 | 0.673 | +0.1% |
| 1964 | 0.673 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.681 | +1.2% |
| 1966 | 0.678 | -0.4% |
| 1967 | 0.673 | -0.7% |
| 1968 | 0.676 | +0.4% |
| 1969 | 0.682 | +0.9% |
| 1970 | 0.673 | -1.3% |
| 1971 | 0.679 | +0.9% |
| 1972 | 0.684 | +0.7% |
| 1973 | 0.689 | +0.7% |
| 1974 | 0.689 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.679 | -1.5% |
| 1976 | 0.677 | -0.3% |
| 1977 | 0.677 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.677 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.688 | +1.6% |
| 1980 | 0.688 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.688 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.688 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.688 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.688 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.688 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.676 | -1.7% |
| 1987 | 0.663 | -1.9% |
| 1988 | 0.645 | -2.7% |
| 1989 | 0.617 | -4.3% |
| 1990 | 0.824 | +33.5% |
| 1991 | 0.799 | -3.0% |
| 1992 | 0.799 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.82 | +2.6% |
| 1994 | 0.82 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.82 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.82 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.82 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.82 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.82 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.82 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.82 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.82 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.82 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.82 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.82 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.86 | +4.9% |
| 2007 | 0.867 | +0.8% |
| 2008 | 0.863 | -0.5% |
| 2009 | 0.865 | +0.2% |
| 2010 | 0.857 | -0.9% |
| 2011 | 0.857 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.859 | +0.2% |
| 2013 | 0.964 | +12.2% |
| 2014 | 0.963 | -0.1% |
| 2015 | 0.964 | +0.1% |
| 2016 | 0.905 | -6.1% |
| 2017 | 0.958 | +5.9% |
| 2018 | 0.952 | -0.6% |
| 2019 | 0.953 | +0.1% |
| 2020 | 0.955 | +0.2% |
| 2021 | 0.96 | +0.5% |
| 2022 | 0.96 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.955 | -0.5% |
| 2024 | 0.957 | +0.2% |
| 2025 | 0.958 | +0.1% |
Latvia compared with similar countries
- Latvia's 0.958 is above the median for high income countries, which is 0.823, 1.2× the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Latvia's 0.958 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.7595, 1.3× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.037 | 0.037 | 0.037 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.037 | 0.037 | 0.037 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.037 | 0.037 | 0.037 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.037 | 0.037 | 0.037 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.037 | 0.037 | 0.037 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.037 | 0.037 | 0.037 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.0392 | 0.037 | 0.048 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.048 | 0.048 | 0.048 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.0468 | 0.046 | 0.048 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.046 | 0.046 | 0.046 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.046 | 0.046 | 0.046 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.046 | 0.046 | 0.046 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.0664 | 0.057 | 0.08 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.154 | 0.076 | 0.431 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.793 | 0.793 | 0.793 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.793 | 0.793 | 0.793 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.6582 | 0.63 | 0.681 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.6746 | 0.668 | 0.682 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.6812 | 0.673 | 0.689 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.6729 | 0.617 | 0.688 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.8162 | 0.799 | 0.824 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.8375 | 0.82 | 0.867 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.9232 | 0.857 | 0.964 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.9575 | 0.955 | 0.96 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
More social development data for Latvia
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 32,454 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 189 (2025)
- Political Rights Rating 1 (2025)
- Electoral democracy 1 (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Political rights rating fh, gaps filled 1 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0001 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 189 (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0.0176 units per person (2025)
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is equal rights protection index in Latvia?
- Equal rights protection index in Latvia was 0.958 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest equal rights protection index recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.964 in 2013.
- What is the lowest equal rights protection index recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.037 in 1789.
- How does Latvia rank for equal rights protection index?
- Latvia ranks 6th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is equal rights protection index rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 0.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Equal Rights Protection Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which the state protects the rights and freedoms across social groups equally.