Iraq vs Tanzania: Varieties of democracy

Iraq
0.369
in 2025
Tanzania
0.365
in 2025
Iraq rank
105th
Tanzania rank
106th

Varieties of democracy over time

  • Iraq
  • Tanzania
00.10.20.30.40.5178919072025

How they compare

Iraq currently reports 0.369 against 0.365 in Tanzania, a difference of 0.004.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 111 shared years of data; in 1915 it was Iraq ahead.

Iraq ranks 105th and Tanzania ranks 106th of 176 countries.

Across the 12 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 5 and Tanzania in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq Tanzania Difference Ahead
1910s 0.0772 0.042 0.0352 Iraq
1920s 0.1054 0.045 0.0604 Iraq
1930s 0.1347 0.048 0.0867 Iraq
1940s 0.1395 0.052 0.0875 Iraq
1950s 0.1671 0.0764 0.0907 Iraq
1960s 0.0754 0.2517 0.1763 Tanzania
1970s 0.051 0.2422 0.1912 Tanzania
1980s 0.0775 0.255 0.1775 Tanzania
1990s 0.1087 0.4227 0.314 Tanzania
2000s 0.2744 0.4522 0.1778 Tanzania
2010s 0.4006 0.4387 0.0381 Tanzania
2020s 0.3727 0.3888 0.0162 Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher varieties of democracy, Iraq or Tanzania?
Iraq, at 0.369 against 0.365 in Tanzania as of 2025.
What is the difference in varieties of democracy between Iraq and Tanzania?
0.004, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Tanzania?
111 years are reported by both, from 1915 to 2025.
How do Iraq and Tanzania rank globally for varieties of democracy?
Iraq ranks 105th and Tanzania ranks 106th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Varieties of democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Varieties of democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.