Suriname vs Trinidad and Tobago: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Suriname
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 1.4 against 1.29 in Suriname, a difference of 0.11.
That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
Suriname ranks 77th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 74th of 193 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Suriname averaged higher in 2 and Trinidad and Tobago in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Suriname | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.3274 | 1.8 | 1.48 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 1980s | -0.7173 | 1.64 | 2.36 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 1990s | 0.5936 | 0.9028 | 0.3092 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2000s | 1.21 | 0.9367 | 0.2714 | Suriname |
| 2010s | 1.44 | 1.1 | 0.3392 | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Suriname or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 1.4 against 1.29 in Suriname as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Suriname and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.11, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2019.
- How do Suriname and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Suriname ranks 77th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 74th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.