Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Switzerland: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Saint Kitts and Nevis
2.62
in 2019
Switzerland
2.62
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
34th
Switzerland rank
35th
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Switzerland
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 2.62 against 2.62 in Switzerland, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Switzerland ahead.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 34th and Switzerland ranks 35th of 193 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Saint Kitts and Nevis averaged higher in 1 and Switzerland in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.7579 | 1.49 | 0.729 | Switzerland |
| 1990s | 1.03 | 1.71 | 0.6858 | Switzerland |
| 2000s | 1.99 | 1.78 | 0.2052 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 2.24 | 2.44 | 0.1982 | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Switzerland?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 2.62 against 2.62 in Switzerland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Switzerland?
- 0, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Switzerland?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2019.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Switzerland rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 34th and Switzerland ranks 35th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.