Serbia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Serbia
1.44
in 2018
Trinidad and Tobago
1.4
in 2019
Serbia rank
72nd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
74th
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Serbia
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 1.44 against 1.4 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.04.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 57 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
Serbia ranks 72nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 74th of 193 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -0.9678 | 1.95 | 2.92 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 1970s | -0.7307 | 1.9 | 2.63 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 1980s | -0.8008 | 1.64 | 2.44 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 1990s | -1.51 | 0.9028 | 2.41 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2000s | 0.252 | 0.9367 | 0.6847 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 1.43 | 1.07 | 0.3551 | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Serbia or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Serbia, at 1.44 against 1.4 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2018.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Serbia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.04, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 57 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2018.
- How do Serbia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Serbia ranks 72nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 74th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.