Sao Tome and Principe vs Slovenia: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Sao Tome and Principe
3.63
in 2019
Slovenia
3.47
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe rank
14th
Slovenia rank
15th
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Sao Tome and Principe
- Slovenia
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 3.63 against 3.47 in Slovenia, a difference of 0.16.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 29 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Slovenia ahead.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 14th and Slovenia ranks 15th of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sao Tome and Principe | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.97 | 2.63 | 0.6558 | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 2.55 | 2.65 | 0.0932 | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 3.57 | 3.34 | 0.2234 | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Sao Tome and Principe or Slovenia?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 3.63 against 3.47 in Slovenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Sao Tome and Principe and Slovenia?
- 0.16, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Slovenia?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2019.
- How do Sao Tome and Principe and Slovenia rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 14th and Slovenia ranks 15th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.