Panama vs Switzerland: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Panama
2.66
in 2019
Switzerland
2.62
in 2019
Panama rank
32nd
Switzerland rank
35th
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Panama
- Switzerland
How they compare
Panama currently reports 2.66 against 2.62 in Switzerland, a difference of 0.04.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 74 shared years of data; in 1946 it was Panama ahead.
Panama ranks 32nd and Switzerland ranks 35th of 193 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 2 and Switzerland in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 0.0168 | 0.0095 | 0.0072 | Panama |
| 1950s | 0.0397 | 0.0356 | 0.0041 | Panama |
| 1960s | 0.1836 | 0.318 | 0.1345 | Switzerland |
| 1970s | 0.0662 | 0.9987 | 0.9325 | Switzerland |
| 1980s | -0.5191 | 1.43 | 1.94 | Switzerland |
| 1990s | 0.3971 | 1.71 | 1.31 | Switzerland |
| 2000s | 1.68 | 1.78 | 0.1021 | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 2.1 | 2.44 | 0.3361 | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Panama or Switzerland?
- Panama, at 2.66 against 2.62 in Switzerland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Panama and Switzerland?
- 0.04, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Switzerland?
- 74 years are reported by both, from 1946 to 2019.
- How do Panama and Switzerland rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Panama ranks 32nd and Switzerland ranks 35th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.