Pakistan vs Saudi Arabia: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Pakistan
-0.9447
in 2019
Saudi Arabia
-1.12
in 2019
Pakistan rank
162nd
Saudi Arabia rank
164th
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Pakistan
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports -0.9447 against -1.12 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.1753.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 73 shared years of data; in 1947 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Pakistan ranks 162nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 164th of 193 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | -0.1948 | 0.7156 | 0.9104 | Saudi Arabia |
| 1950s | -0.7228 | 0.5569 | 1.28 | Saudi Arabia |
| 1960s | -1.98 | 0.2215 | 2.2 | Saudi Arabia |
| 1970s | -2.07 | 0.1603 | 2.23 | Saudi Arabia |
| 1980s | -1.19 | -0.434 | 0.7594 | Saudi Arabia |
| 1990s | -1.28 | -0.4114 | 0.8733 | Saudi Arabia |
| 2000s | -1.33 | -0.3011 | 1.03 | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | -1.26 | -0.7172 | 0.5471 | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Pakistan or Saudi Arabia?
- Pakistan, at -0.9447 against -1.12 in Saudi Arabia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.1753, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Saudi Arabia?
- 73 years are reported by both, from 1947 to 2019.
- How do Pakistan and Saudi Arabia rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Pakistan ranks 162nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 164th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.