Nicaragua vs Vietnam: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Nicaragua
-0.8475
in 2019
Vietnam
-0.6366
in 2019
Nicaragua rank
160th
Vietnam rank
157th
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Nicaragua
- Vietnam
How they compare
Vietnam currently reports -0.6366 against -0.8475 in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.2109.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1954 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 160th and Vietnam ranks 157th of 193 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 5 and Vietnam in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 0.1552 | -1.7 | 1.86 | Nicaragua |
| 1960s | 0.1731 | -1.33 | 1.5 | Nicaragua |
| 1970s | -0.9681 | -1.5 | 0.5365 | Nicaragua |
| 1980s | -1.75 | -1.47 | 0.2802 | Vietnam |
| 1990s | -0.637 | 0.0012 | 0.6382 | Vietnam |
| 2000s | 0.4641 | -0.0423 | 0.5064 | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | -0.0079 | -0.2578 | 0.25 | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Nicaragua or Vietnam?
- Vietnam, at -0.6366 against -0.8475 in Nicaragua as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Nicaragua and Vietnam?
- 0.2109, with Vietnam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Vietnam?
- 66 years are reported by both, from 1954 to 2019.
- How do Nicaragua and Vietnam rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Nicaragua ranks 160th and Vietnam ranks 157th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.