Nicaragua vs Pakistan: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Nicaragua
-0.8475
in 2019
Pakistan
-0.9447
in 2019
Nicaragua rank
160th
Pakistan rank
162nd
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Nicaragua
- Pakistan
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports -0.8475 against -0.9447 in Pakistan, a difference of 0.0972.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 73 shared years of data; in 1947 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 160th and Pakistan ranks 162nd of 193 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 7 and Pakistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 0.1638 | -0.1948 | 0.3586 | Nicaragua |
| 1950s | 0.1853 | -0.7228 | 0.9081 | Nicaragua |
| 1960s | 0.1731 | -1.98 | 2.15 | Nicaragua |
| 1970s | -0.9681 | -2.07 | 1.1 | Nicaragua |
| 1980s | -1.75 | -1.19 | 0.5578 | Pakistan |
| 1990s | -0.637 | -1.28 | 0.6477 | Nicaragua |
| 2000s | 0.4641 | -1.33 | 1.79 | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | -0.0079 | -1.26 | 1.26 | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Nicaragua or Pakistan?
- Nicaragua, at -0.8475 against -0.9447 in Pakistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Nicaragua and Pakistan?
- 0.0972, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Pakistan?
- 73 years are reported by both, from 1947 to 2019.
- How do Nicaragua and Pakistan rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Nicaragua ranks 160th and Pakistan ranks 162nd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.