Netherlands vs Solomon Islands: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Netherlands
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 4.03 against 3.75 in Netherlands, a difference of 0.28.
That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.1 times Netherlands's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 42 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Netherlands ahead.
Netherlands ranks 12th and Solomon Islands ranks 11th of 193 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Netherlands averaged higher in 4 and Solomon Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Netherlands | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 2.05 | 1.52 | 0.5311 | Netherlands |
| 1980s | 2.91 | 1.89 | 1.02 | Netherlands |
| 1990s | 3.75 | 1.72 | 2.03 | Netherlands |
| 2000s | 3.86 | 1.79 | 2.08 | Netherlands |
| 2010s | 3.66 | 4 | 0.3402 | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Netherlands or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 4.03 against 3.75 in Netherlands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Netherlands and Solomon Islands?
- 0.28, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and Solomon Islands?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2019.
- How do Netherlands and Solomon Islands rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Netherlands ranks 12th and Solomon Islands ranks 11th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.