Netherlands vs Sao Tome and Principe: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Netherlands
3.75
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
3.63
in 2019
Netherlands rank
12th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
14th
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Netherlands
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Netherlands currently reports 3.75 against 3.63 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.12.
Across all 45 years both countries report, Netherlands has been ahead every year.
Netherlands ranks 12th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 14th of 193 countries.
Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Netherlands | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1.82 | 0.8025 | 1.01 | Netherlands |
| 1980s | 2.91 | 0.4924 | 2.42 | Netherlands |
| 1990s | 3.75 | 1.92 | 1.83 | Netherlands |
| 2000s | 3.86 | 2.55 | 1.31 | Netherlands |
| 2010s | 3.66 | 3.57 | 0.0961 | Netherlands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Netherlands or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Netherlands, at 3.75 against 3.63 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Netherlands and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.12, with Netherlands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2019.
- How do Netherlands and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Netherlands ranks 12th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 14th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.