Mongolia vs Peru: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Mongolia
0.9959
in 2019
Peru
1.07
in 2019
Mongolia rank
94th
Peru rank
93rd
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Mongolia
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 1.07 against 0.9959 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0741.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 74 shared years of data; in 1946 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 94th and Peru ranks 93rd of 193 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 2.29 | 0.0619 | 2.22 | Mongolia |
| 1950s | 2.98 | 0.0271 | 2.96 | Mongolia |
| 1960s | 2.96 | -0.0925 | 3.05 | Mongolia |
| 1970s | 2.77 | -0.5652 | 3.33 | Mongolia |
| 1980s | 1.88 | -1.74 | 3.62 | Mongolia |
| 1990s | 1.5 | -1.41 | 2.92 | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 0.7831 | 0.1716 | 0.6115 | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0.8639 | 0.6444 | 0.2195 | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Mongolia or Peru?
- Peru, at 1.07 against 0.9959 in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Mongolia and Peru?
- 0.0741, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Peru?
- 74 years are reported by both, from 1946 to 2019.
- How do Mongolia and Peru rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Mongolia ranks 94th and Peru ranks 93rd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.