Mongolia vs Paraguay: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Mongolia
- Paraguay
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 1.08 against 0.9959 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0841.
That makes Paraguay's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 74 shared years of data; in 1946 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 94th and Paraguay ranks 92nd of 193 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 7 and Paraguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 2.29 | -0.0296 | 2.32 | Mongolia |
| 1950s | 2.98 | -0.1971 | 3.18 | Mongolia |
| 1960s | 2.96 | -1.68 | 4.65 | Mongolia |
| 1970s | 2.77 | -1.31 | 4.08 | Mongolia |
| 1980s | 1.88 | -0.9076 | 2.79 | Mongolia |
| 1990s | 1.5 | -0.2045 | 1.71 | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 0.7831 | 0.2149 | 0.5682 | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0.8639 | 0.9051 | 0.0412 | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Mongolia or Paraguay?
- Paraguay, at 1.08 against 0.9959 in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Mongolia and Paraguay?
- 0.0841, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Paraguay?
- 74 years are reported by both, from 1946 to 2019.
- How do Mongolia and Paraguay rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Mongolia ranks 94th and Paraguay ranks 92nd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.