Mongolia vs Morocco: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Mongolia
0.9959
in 2019
Morocco
0.938
in 2019
Mongolia rank
94th
Morocco rank
97th
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Mongolia
- Morocco
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0.9959 against 0.938 in Morocco, a difference of 0.0579.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Morocco's.
Across all 64 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 94th and Morocco ranks 97th of 193 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 3.12 | -0.1154 | 3.23 | Mongolia |
| 1960s | 2.96 | -0.2769 | 3.24 | Mongolia |
| 1970s | 2.77 | -0.5849 | 3.35 | Mongolia |
| 1980s | 1.88 | -0.8687 | 2.75 | Mongolia |
| 1990s | 1.5 | -0.413 | 1.92 | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 0.7831 | 0.1574 | 0.6257 | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0.8639 | 0.4116 | 0.4523 | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Mongolia or Morocco?
- Mongolia, at 0.9959 against 0.938 in Morocco as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Mongolia and Morocco?
- 0.0579, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Morocco?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1956 to 2019.
- How do Mongolia and Morocco rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Mongolia ranks 94th and Morocco ranks 97th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.