Marshall Islands vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Marshall Islands
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 2.46 against 2.46 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
Marshall Islands ranks 38th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 39th of 193 countries.
Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.25 | 1.86 | 0.3978 | Marshall Islands |
| 2000s | 3.16 | 1.65 | 1.52 | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 2.42 | 1.96 | 0.4584 | Marshall Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Marshall Islands or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Marshall Islands, at 2.46 against 2.46 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Marshall Islands and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2019.
- How do Marshall Islands and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Marshall Islands ranks 38th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 39th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.