Malaysia vs Tunisia: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Malaysia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 0.1891 against 0.1103 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.0788.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.7 times Malaysia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1957 it was Tunisia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 123rd and Tunisia ranks 121st of 193 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 3 and Tunisia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | -1.26 | -0.4535 | 0.8034 | Tunisia |
| 1960s | -1.31 | -0.1743 | 1.14 | Tunisia |
| 1970s | -1.19 | -0.1019 | 1.09 | Tunisia |
| 1980s | -0.3012 | -0.433 | 0.1317 | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 0.2471 | -0.5314 | 0.7785 | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 0.4576 | -0.1441 | 0.6017 | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 0.249 | 0.2606 | 0.0116 | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Malaysia or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 0.1891 against 0.1103 in Malaysia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Malaysia and Tunisia?
- 0.0788, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Tunisia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1957 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and Tunisia rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Malaysia ranks 123rd and Tunisia ranks 121st of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.