Madagascar vs Zimbabwe: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Madagascar
-0.4432
in 2019
Zimbabwe
-0.4662
in 2019
Madagascar rank
149th
Zimbabwe rank
151st
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Madagascar
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports -0.4432 against -0.4662 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.023.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Madagascar ahead.
Madagascar ranks 149th and Zimbabwe ranks 151st of 193 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.14 | -0.6578 | 1.8 | Madagascar |
| 1970s | 0.5245 | -1.28 | 1.81 | Madagascar |
| 1980s | -0.2528 | -1.11 | 0.8595 | Madagascar |
| 1990s | 0.0151 | -0.1301 | 0.1451 | Madagascar |
| 2000s | 0.4616 | -1.19 | 1.65 | Madagascar |
| 2010s | -0.3517 | -0.6473 | 0.2956 | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Madagascar or Zimbabwe?
- Madagascar, at -0.4432 against -0.4662 in Zimbabwe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Madagascar and Zimbabwe?
- 0.023, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Zimbabwe?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2019.
- How do Madagascar and Zimbabwe rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Madagascar ranks 149th and Zimbabwe ranks 151st of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.