Lithuania vs Seychelles: Physical Integrity Rights Score

Lithuania
2.22
in 2019
Seychelles
2.19
in 2019
Lithuania rank
46th
Seychelles rank
48th

Physical Integrity Rights Score over time

  • Lithuania
  • Seychelles
-1012197619972019

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 2.22 against 2.19 in Seychelles, a difference of 0.03.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Seychelles ahead.

Lithuania ranks 46th and Seychelles ranks 48th of 193 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 3 and Seychelles in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Seychelles Difference Ahead
1980s -0.6309 0.301 0.9319 Seychelles
1990s 1.41 1.16 0.2529 Lithuania
2000s 2.12 1.84 0.2811 Lithuania
2010s 2.12 1.92 0.196 Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Lithuania or Seychelles?
Lithuania, at 2.22 against 2.19 in Seychelles as of 2019.
What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Lithuania and Seychelles?
0.03, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Seychelles?
35 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2019.
How do Lithuania and Seychelles rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
Lithuania ranks 46th and Seychelles ranks 48th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Fariss et al. (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Physical Integrity Rights Score
Source
Fariss et al. (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
193 places, 11,139 data points, 1946–2019
Last refreshed

The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.