Libya vs Myanmar: Physical Integrity Rights Score

Libya
-2.02
in 2019
Myanmar
-2.09
in 2019
Libya rank
191st
Myanmar rank
193rd

Physical Integrity Rights Score over time

  • Libya
  • Myanmar
-2-10194819832019

How they compare

Libya currently reports -2.02 against -2.09 in Myanmar, a difference of 0.07.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 69 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Libya ahead.

Libya ranks 191st and Myanmar ranks 193rd of 193 countries.

Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Myanmar Difference Ahead
1950s 0.3056 -1.82 2.12 Libya
1960s 0.2868 -1.78 2.06 Libya
1970s -0.3472 -1.78 1.43 Libya
1980s -1.49 -1.64 0.1431 Libya
1990s -0.9331 -1.92 0.9854 Libya
2000s -0.4367 -1.89 1.45 Libya
2010s -1.46 -1.82 0.352 Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Libya or Myanmar?
Libya, at -2.02 against -2.09 in Myanmar as of 2019.
What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Libya and Myanmar?
0.07, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Myanmar?
69 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2019.
How do Libya and Myanmar rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
Libya ranks 191st and Myanmar ranks 193rd of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Fariss et al. (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Physical Integrity Rights Score
Source
Fariss et al. (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
193 places, 11,139 data points, 1946–2019
Last refreshed

The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.