Liberia vs Maldives: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Liberia
0.7772
in 2019
Maldives
0.7439
in 2019
Liberia rank
100th
Maldives rank
101st
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Liberia
- Maldives
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 0.7772 against 0.7439 in Maldives, a difference of 0.0333.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Maldives ahead.
Liberia ranks 100th and Maldives ranks 101st of 193 countries.
Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liberia | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.7378 | 1.6 | 0.8622 | Maldives |
| 1970s | 0.6426 | 1.23 | 0.5865 | Maldives |
| 1980s | -0.7399 | 0.7596 | 1.5 | Maldives |
| 1990s | -1.59 | 0.8583 | 2.45 | Maldives |
| 2000s | -0.6157 | 1.25 | 1.86 | Maldives |
| 2010s | 0.8703 | 1.07 | 0.1959 | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Liberia or Maldives?
- Liberia, at 0.7772 against 0.7439 in Maldives as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Liberia and Maldives?
- 0.0333, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Maldives?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2019.
- How do Liberia and Maldives rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Liberia ranks 100th and Maldives ranks 101st of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.