Lesotho vs Sierra Leone: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Lesotho
0.5943
in 2019
Sierra Leone
0.5941
in 2019
Lesotho rank
103rd
Sierra Leone rank
104th
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Lesotho
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 0.5943 against 0.5941 in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.0002.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Lesotho ahead.
Lesotho ranks 103rd and Sierra Leone ranks 104th of 193 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 5 and Sierra Leone in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.6523 | 0.2456 | 0.4066 | Lesotho |
| 1970s | 0.6216 | 0.084 | 0.5376 | Lesotho |
| 1980s | -0.2224 | 0.161 | 0.3835 | Sierra Leone |
| 1990s | 0.2115 | -1.56 | 1.78 | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 1.01 | -0.0058 | 1.02 | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 0.7682 | 0.7213 | 0.0469 | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Lesotho or Sierra Leone?
- Lesotho, at 0.5943 against 0.5941 in Sierra Leone as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Lesotho and Sierra Leone?
- 0.0002, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Sierra Leone?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2019.
- How do Lesotho and Sierra Leone rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Lesotho ranks 103rd and Sierra Leone ranks 104th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.