Latvia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Latvia
2.64
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
2.62
in 2019
Latvia rank
33rd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
34th
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Latvia
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 2.64 against 2.62 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.02.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Latvia ranks 33rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 34th of 193 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | -0.4729 | 0.7932 | 1.27 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 1990s | 0.861 | 1.03 | 0.1641 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2000s | 1.73 | 1.99 | 0.2591 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 2.07 | 2.24 | 0.1664 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Latvia or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Latvia, at 2.64 against 2.62 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Latvia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.02, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2019.
- How do Latvia and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Latvia ranks 33rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 34th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.