Kyrgyzstan vs United Arab Emirates: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 0.0856 against 0.0623 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.0233.
That makes United Arab Emirates's figure about 1.4 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 29 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 126th and United Arab Emirates ranks 125th of 193 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.13 | 1.24 | 0.108 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2000s | 0.3239 | 1.28 | 0.96 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | -0.1635 | 0.5579 | 0.7214 | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Kyrgyzstan or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 0.0856 against 0.0623 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Kyrgyzstan and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.0233, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and United Arab Emirates?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and United Arab Emirates rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 126th and United Arab Emirates ranks 125th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.