Italy vs South Korea: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Italy
1.88
in 2019
South Korea
1.85
in 2019
Italy rank
57th
South Korea rank
59th
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Italy
- South Korea
How they compare
Italy currently reports 1.88 against 1.85 in South Korea, a difference of 0.03.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 72 shared years of data; in 1948 it was Italy ahead.
Italy ranks 57th and South Korea ranks 59th of 193 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Italy averaged higher in 7 and South Korea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | -0.009 | -1.46 | 1.45 | Italy |
| 1950s | -0.0031 | -0.6301 | 0.6271 | Italy |
| 1960s | 0.0936 | 0.0062 | 0.0874 | Italy |
| 1970s | 0.6721 | -0.4695 | 1.14 | Italy |
| 1980s | 0.9155 | -0.7633 | 1.68 | Italy |
| 1990s | 1.01 | -0.097 | 1.11 | Italy |
| 2000s | 1.34 | 1.07 | 0.2725 | Italy |
| 2010s | 1.5 | 1.71 | 0.2106 | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Italy or South Korea?
- Italy, at 1.88 against 1.85 in South Korea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Italy and South Korea?
- 0.03, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and South Korea?
- 72 years are reported by both, from 1948 to 2019.
- How do Italy and South Korea rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Italy ranks 57th and South Korea ranks 59th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.