Ireland vs Japan: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Ireland
3.12
in 2019
Japan
2.87
in 2019
Ireland rank
24th
Japan rank
27th
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Ireland
- Japan
How they compare
Ireland currently reports 3.12 against 2.87 in Japan, a difference of 0.25.
That makes Ireland's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 74 shared years of data; in 1946 it was Ireland ahead.
Ireland ranks 24th and Japan ranks 27th of 193 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Ireland averaged higher in 7 and Japan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 0.7384 | 0.2019 | 0.5366 | Ireland |
| 1950s | 0.7962 | 0.189 | 0.6073 | Ireland |
| 1960s | 0.6939 | 0.4659 | 0.228 | Ireland |
| 1970s | 1.34 | 1.31 | 0.028 | Ireland |
| 1980s | 1.84 | 1.98 | 0.1431 | Japan |
| 1990s | 2.38 | 1.44 | 0.938 | Ireland |
| 2000s | 2.48 | 2.02 | 0.4538 | Ireland |
| 2010s | 2.87 | 2.47 | 0.3934 | Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Ireland or Japan?
- Ireland, at 3.12 against 2.87 in Japan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Ireland and Japan?
- 0.25, with Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Japan?
- 74 years are reported by both, from 1946 to 2019.
- How do Ireland and Japan rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Ireland ranks 24th and Japan ranks 27th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.