India vs Pakistan: Physical Integrity Rights Score
India
-1.06
in 2019
Pakistan
-0.9447
in 2019
India rank
163rd
Pakistan rank
162nd
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- India
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports -0.9447 against -1.06 in India, a difference of 0.1153.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 73 shared years of data; in 1947 it was Pakistan ahead.
India ranks 163rd and Pakistan ranks 162nd of 193 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, India averaged higher in 4 and Pakistan in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | -0.7056 | -0.1948 | 0.5108 | Pakistan |
| 1950s | -0.3609 | -0.7228 | 0.3618 | India |
| 1960s | -0.7476 | -1.98 | 1.23 | India |
| 1970s | -1.84 | -2.07 | 0.2249 | India |
| 1980s | -1.65 | -1.19 | 0.4607 | Pakistan |
| 1990s | -1.7 | -1.28 | 0.4149 | Pakistan |
| 2000s | -1.53 | -1.33 | 0.1987 | Pakistan |
| 2010s | -1.11 | -1.26 | 0.1587 | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, India or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at -0.9447 against -1.06 in India as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between India and Pakistan?
- 0.1153, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Pakistan?
- 73 years are reported by both, from 1947 to 2019.
- How do India and Pakistan rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- India ranks 163rd and Pakistan ranks 162nd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.