Iceland vs Luxembourg: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Iceland
5.16
in 2019
Luxembourg
5.31
in 2019
Iceland rank
2nd
Luxembourg rank
1st
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Iceland
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 5.31 against 5.16 in Iceland, a difference of 0.15.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 74 shared years of data; in 1946 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Iceland ranks 2nd and Luxembourg ranks 1st of 193 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 7.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 2.29 | 2.4 | 0.1089 | Luxembourg |
| 1950s | 3.38 | 3.65 | 0.2711 | Luxembourg |
| 1960s | 4.22 | 4.58 | 0.3592 | Luxembourg |
| 1970s | 4.74 | 4.88 | 0.1398 | Luxembourg |
| 1980s | 4.82 | 4.8 | 0.0166 | Iceland |
| 1990s | 4.71 | 4.72 | 0.0159 | Luxembourg |
| 2000s | 4.99 | 5.2 | 0.2067 | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 5.15 | 5.32 | 0.1751 | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Iceland or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 5.31 against 5.16 in Iceland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Iceland and Luxembourg?
- 0.15, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Luxembourg?
- 74 years are reported by both, from 1946 to 2019.
- How do Iceland and Luxembourg rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Iceland ranks 2nd and Luxembourg ranks 1st of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.