Hungary vs Trinidad and Tobago: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Hungary
1.45
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
1.4
in 2019
Hungary rank
71st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
74th
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Hungary
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 1.45 against 1.4 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.05.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
Hungary ranks 71st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 74th of 193 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 3 and Trinidad and Tobago in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -0.2838 | 1.95 | 2.24 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 1970s | 0.258 | 1.9 | 1.65 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 1980s | 0.5846 | 1.64 | 1.05 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 1990s | 1.45 | 0.9028 | 0.5427 | Hungary |
| 2000s | 1.32 | 0.9367 | 0.3857 | Hungary |
| 2010s | 1.49 | 1.1 | 0.3899 | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Hungary or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Hungary, at 1.45 against 1.4 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Hungary and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.05, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 58 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2019.
- How do Hungary and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Hungary ranks 71st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 74th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.