Honduras vs Madagascar: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Honduras
-0.3722
in 2019
Madagascar
-0.4432
in 2019
Honduras rank
147th
Madagascar rank
149th
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Honduras
- Madagascar
How they compare
Honduras currently reports -0.3722 against -0.4432 in Madagascar, a difference of 0.071.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Madagascar ahead.
Honduras ranks 147th and Madagascar ranks 149th of 193 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 2 and Madagascar in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.6866 | 1.19 | 0.5003 | Madagascar |
| 1970s | 0.6086 | 0.5245 | 0.084 | Honduras |
| 1980s | -1.05 | -0.2528 | 0.8004 | Madagascar |
| 1990s | -0.3563 | 0.0151 | 0.3714 | Madagascar |
| 2000s | -0.1651 | 0.4616 | 0.6266 | Madagascar |
| 2010s | -0.2446 | -0.3517 | 0.1071 | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Honduras or Madagascar?
- Honduras, at -0.3722 against -0.4432 in Madagascar as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Honduras and Madagascar?
- 0.071, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Madagascar?
- 60 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2019.
- How do Honduras and Madagascar rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Honduras ranks 147th and Madagascar ranks 149th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.