Grenada vs Vanuatu: Physical Integrity Rights Score

Grenada
2.8
in 2019
Vanuatu
2.78
in 2019
Grenada rank
28th
Vanuatu rank
29th

Physical Integrity Rights Score over time

  • Grenada
  • Vanuatu
-10123197419962019

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 2.8 against 2.78 in Vanuatu, a difference of 0.02.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Grenada ahead.

Grenada ranks 28th and Vanuatu ranks 29th of 193 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 4 and Vanuatu in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada Vanuatu Difference Ahead
1970s -0.5302 -0.646 0.1158 Grenada
1980s 0.9741 1.31 0.3351 Vanuatu
1990s 2.68 2.15 0.5245 Grenada
2000s 2.52 2.33 0.1898 Grenada
2010s 2.51 2.44 0.0638 Grenada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Grenada or Vanuatu?
Grenada, at 2.8 against 2.78 in Vanuatu as of 2019.
What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Grenada and Vanuatu?
0.02, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Vanuatu?
41 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2019.
How do Grenada and Vanuatu rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
Grenada ranks 28th and Vanuatu ranks 29th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Fariss et al. (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Physical Integrity Rights Score
Source
Fariss et al. (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
193 places, 11,139 data points, 1946–2019
Last refreshed

The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.